Talk:Data-oriented design

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Super Mutant (6 participants)
Altaïr Ibn-LaʼAhad (3 participants)
Police Trainer (0 participants)
Turboraketti (4 participants)
Beam Invader (1 participant)
Sephiroth (14 participants)
1993 Space Machine (2 participants)
The Boss (Metal Gear) (0 participants)
Silfade (2 participants)
List of World of Watches characters (2 participants)
Nodus Domini (2 participants)
List of Fate/Grand Order characters (9 participants)
Balloon Brothers (2 participants; relisted)
Enigma Engine (2 participants; relisted)
ClanLib (5 participants; relisted)
Dan Gelber (game designer) (5 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Contrast with object orientation[edit]

I think this article and section has nothing to do with OOP. OOP doesn't impose specific constraints on data layouts or composition. It mostly concerns the fact of linking certain set of methods to a certain type of data instances. That's it. I also see no WP:SECONDARY sources.
@Pooryorick~enwiki: I propose to completely eliminate the section as pure speculations. AXONOV (talk) ⚑ 11:29, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This topic have a confusion between data-oriented programming and data-oriented design. HAve a mix between both Inkeliz (talk) 16:39, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The paragraph Motives is a badly constructed narrative.[edit]

It describes a relation between console and 'top of the line' PCs. It also describes that for consoles it is a design choice to dedicate more resources to the GPU. The problem is that 'top of the line' PC's cost an order of magnitude more than a typical console. That means that the most important factor for the lower specs/performance of the console CPUs is actually cost. But cost is not mentioned once in the paragraph. 94.210.69.136 (talk) 11:58, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]