Talk:De La Salle – College of Saint Benilde

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Former good article De La Salle – College of Saint Benilde was one of the Social sciences and society good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
Date Process Result
January 7, 2007 Good article nominee Listed
January 14, 2008 Peer review Reviewed
February 24, 2010 Good article reassessment Delisted
Current status: Delisted good article

GA Reassessment[edit]

This discussion is transcluded from Talk:De La Salle-College of Saint Benilde/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.

Starting GA reassessment as part of the GA Sweeps process. Jezhotwells (talk) 22:50, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria[edit]

Symbol unsupport vote.svg To uphold the quality of Wikipedia:Good articles, all articles listed as Good articles are being reviewed against the GA criteria as part of the GA project quality task force. While all the hard work that has gone into this article is appreciated, unfortunately, as of February 24, 2010, this article fails to satisfy the criteria, as detailed below. For that reason, the article has been delisted from WP:GA. However, if improvements are made bringing the article up to standards, the article may be nominated at WP:GAN. If you feel this decision has been made in error, you may seek remediation at WP:GAR.

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    WP:LEAD suggests 4 paragraphs at most.
    There are a large number of single sentence paragraphs, please copy-edit throughout for style and readability.  Done
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    I repaired some dead links and tagged 3 for which no archived version could be found using WP:CHECKLINKS  Done
    There is inconsistency in the some of the in-line citations, some are bare urls, please use citation templates to ensure consistency.  Done Not done fully. We need publisher, page number for books and journals, publisher, accessdate for online sources.
    Citations are needed for a large number of paragraphs throughout. Not done
    I am also concerned at the fact that only four of the forty odd references are to third party reliable sources, the rest are primary sources.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    On hold for seven days for above issues to be addressed. Major contributors and projects will be notified. Jezhotwells (talk) 23:15, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
    OK, there have been some improvements but there is still a long way to go. I am going to de-list this and it can be brought to WP:GAN when these concerns have been addressed Jezhotwells (talk) 09:57, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on De La Salle–College of Saint Benilde. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:17, 28 March 2016 (UTC)