This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Please recheck your references. One comes back with a suspicious/dead link (fn119 - soft 404); 4 come back to connection issues. There are 3 paywall refs (which are OK, just noting their presence). If possible to use an archive site, that is preferable, but not required. OK, with the connection error showing as noted below by SV - and like she said, the link itself works fine.
On hold for 7 days to check footnotes/refs. I don't anticipate any problem in passing this once that is fixed. Passed, congratulations.
Hi Greg, many thanks for the review. I think I've fixed the links. This one is still coming up blue, but when I click on it, it's fine.
Regarding the two fair-use images (PC Blakelock in uniform, and his overalls after the attack), there aren't any free replacements, so it's either fair use or nothing, I'm afraid. SlimVirgin(talk) 22:20, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
Yeah, I was afraid that might be the case. It is properly justified, and like I said, doesn't affect it passing GA. You would know more about going to FA with it than I would, but I encourage you to nominate it for FA. It's a very good article. GregJackPBoomer! 23:53, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
Thanks very much for passing it, Greg, and I'll definitely think about taking it to FA. SlimVirgin(talk) 23:59, 19 August 2013 (UTC)