Talk:Deepika Padukone

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Featured article Deepika Padukone is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophy This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on January 5, 2014.
Article milestones
Date Process Result
September 7, 2013 Good article nominee Listed
October 14, 2013 Featured article candidate Promoted
Current status: Featured article

References[edit]

Deepika received 4 Teen Choice nominations not just 1[edit]

@Krimuk2.0 Apologies for reverting your changes. Even if you don't consider Bollyworm as reliable website, change the citation not the facts! Search the internet. She has received 3 additional nominations in the second wave of Teen Choice Awards 2017 nomination released a couple of days before. Here are more legit citations you can rather refer to instead:

http://www.billboard.com/articles/news/7865210/teen-choice-awards-2017-nominations-second-wave (YOU CANT NEGLECT BILLBOARD.COM!) http://www.tvguide.com/news/teen-choice-awards-nominations-complete/ http://www.eonline.com/news/866031/teen-choice-awards-2017-reveal-second-wave-of-nominations — Preceding unsigned comment added by DarpSinghh (talkcontribs) 11:35, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

Krimuk2.0, this is to notify you that he's right. --Kailash29792 (talk) 13:31, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
Sure. My revert simply stated that Bollyworm is not WP:RS. The Billboard one is, which is what should be used. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 16:06, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
DarpSinghh, can you please replace the Bollyworm source with Billboard? Krimuk, once he does that, can you do c/e? I do not want to interfere with the article's smoothness. --Kailash29792 (talk) 16:26, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

Krimuk2.0 I thought you didnt believe the news as it was mentioned on non-reliable website. Like I said, change the citation which can be replaced instead of completely reverting the mentioned fact. And by the way why didn't you revert when an anonymous user wrote her as "Oscar Academy" (Note: not Academy Awards, Oscar Academy 😂😂) member on Accolades summary? It stayed there for a week. She just received an invitation, she hasn't confirmed and the ceremony is next year.

Kailash29792 I have updated the citation with Billboard.com article. Thank you so much for helping :) DarpSinghh (talk) 18:03, 14 July 2017 (UTC)