Talk:Democratic elements of Roman Republic

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Rome  
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rome, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the city of Rome and ancient Roman history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome (Rated Start-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is part of the WikiProject for Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors who write Wikipedia's Classics articles. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Started Article[edit]

This text was originally from History of democracy, however it was was felt to be too focused on Roman history to be relevant to a history of democracy. This text was taken directly from that article and placed here. If it can be absorbed into another article, or if it too similar to articles on Roman History, then perhaps it should be deleted. rakkar 02:07, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

I think the title is funny because your mamma looked at it[edit]

The problem is that Ancient Rome was never a democracy, it was a republic. These are two different things!

For example, to be a member of the Senate you must have land, money and influence, clearly making the system not a democratic! In a democracy according to law everybody must have access to power.

It is true though that there were democratic elements in the Republic of Rome but that's it.

So can we rename it, into "Democracy in the Republic of Ancient Rome" or something else? A.Cython (talk) 11:53, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Back Matter[edit]

The reason the Roman State failed in the West is that its institutions were entirely inadequate to resolve the contractions of intergroup conflicts in Roman society, whether within the patrician class or across classes. A precarious tension which they were able to maintain until the late Republic was overwhelmed by the very success of the state overall in its drive to imperium. Subsequently, the interclass tensions which had propelled figures such as the Gracchi, Ceesar, Pompey and others before them as advocates of the non-ruling class interests, led to the complete collapse of the republican institutions and the establishment essentially of a virtual slave state which ultimately was unable to support itself and collapsed in the West. (talk) 17:57, 8 January 2009 (UTC)


The article lacks any reference to the work of Fergus Millar or T.P. Wiseman, which is a fatal deficiency. Cynwolfe (talk) 18:59, 9 June 2013 (UTC)