Talk:Denbigh, Virginia

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Unincorporated?

The opening sentences says that Denbigh was an unincorporated community and that it was long the county seat of Warwick Co. How can the county seat have been unincorporated? Should it say that Denbigh is now an unincorporated community, but that it was long the county seat of Warwick Co.?--174.147.10.131 (talk) 05:06, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unincorporated community is referring to the fact that Denbigh was not an official town or city even though it was within the larger county of Warwick. Therefore, rather than having a mayor and some of the other governing features of a town/city, it was likely governed by the county. The county can place its seat anywhere within the borders of said county; there is no reason to restrict the location to only incorporated towns/cities within the county. Of course now Denbigh is a neighborhood of (is incorporated into) the city of Newport News. The current wording appears to be correct. I hope this helps. --65.222.183.232 (talk) 18:49, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Denbigh, Virginia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:35, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]