Talk:Denmark

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Former good article Denmark was one of the Geography and places good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Wikipedia Version 1.0 Editorial Team / v0.5 (Rated C-class)
WikiProject icon This article has been reviewed by the Version 1.0 Editorial Team.
C-Class article C  Quality: C-Class
Checklist icon
 ???  Importance: not yet rated

The Danish Realm[edit]

The emphasis on The kingdom of Denmark should be diminished, to get this article in line with contemporary reality.

The official term for the Faroe islands, Greenland and Denmark proper, is Det danske rige or Rigsfællesskabet, usually translated as The Danish Realm. The Danish Crown does not own anything in the Faroese Islands or Greenland. They hardly own (or govern) anything in Denmark proper. The term The Kingdom of Denmark is outdated and should be replaced with the term The Danish Realm. Officially The Danish Realm is part of and geographically similar to The Kingdom of Denmark, but The Danish Realm is an actual governing institution, whereas the Danish Crown has very limited political power.

A source: Rigsfællesskabet

Feel free to discuss here, before I make the necessary changes.

RhinoMind (talk) 21:52, 8 September 2015 (UTC)


The page Kingdom of Denmark redirects to Denmark page (current one) and not to the Danish Realm page. I think that #REDIRECT should be moved to Danish Realm from Denmark: do you agree? Filippo83 (talk) 13:38, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Hi. In terms of geography I agree that the Kingdom of Denmark should redirect to The Danish Realm page. If we look closer at the two institutions however, I am not so sure. I am not aware that there is any affiliation bewtween the institutions of the Danish royalty and The Danish Realm. Perhaps more informed people has something to share in this regard. The redirect issue you raise does not have a high priority to me (no offence). RhinoMind (talk) 15:07, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
You seem to contradict this in our conversation elsewhere. I believe that wp:commonname would suggest that the sovereign state, as an entity that encompasses three constituent countries, should be dealt with at Denmark, and that the information specific to the European constituent should be at Denmark (constituent country). We don't have articles on Federal Republic of Germany or Kingdom of Sweden (they are both redirects), because WP:Commonname trumps the full legal name: by the same token, Danish Realm is not a helpful name for an article about the sovereign state, and the current article of that title is very unclear as to whether it refers to the state or the legal arrangements by which that state is constituted. Kevin McE (talk) 09:48, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
@Kevin McE: I think it is most comprehensible if I squeeze in up here. This is an older thread and post you are responding to and as I have become wiser since then, I now (as on the page talk you refers to) propose to have three seperate articles and no redirects. That means articles on "The Kingdom of Denmark", "Denmark" (which is Denmark proper) and "The Danish Realm" (which is synonymous with "The Unity of The Realm"). I think the extended discussion below supports this approach greatly. There is a need for explaining the three concepts and their different histories thoroughly. And we require solid references for all of this, something the discussion below is lacking. RhinoMind (talk) 14:08, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
If you want to suggest a split then make a form proposal. Demolishing half of the lead is not constructive. Nobody is saying that "Denmark" includes territory in North America. Rather, the Kingdom of Denmark is a sovereign state (technically a unitary state with several autonomous areas) which includes Denmark. The first sentence of your revision is inaccurate. --Hazhk (talk) 19:53, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
But this is the article for Kingdom of Denmark. The lead paragraph must therefore reflect that. Kevin McE (talk) 07:43, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
The primary topic of "Denmark" is the country, not the realm. We could have a section on definitions in which the difference between the realm and the kingdom and the state. You are both making this more complicated than it should be topics are not clear cut and this is a case where we just need the article to explain in relatively simple terms that there are a couple of specialized technical meanings of the term that compete with the ordinary term that refers to the country of Denmark proper.·maunus · snunɐɯ· 07:49, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make an article on Denmark proper, or European Denmark, feel free. I cannot accept that there is a sovereign state, recognised by every country in the world and an UN member, that does not have an article on Wikipedia: that is what you are trying to enforce here. This is the destination linked from articles on the Danish Constitution, the UN lists, the article Queen of Denmark and countless other links that treat of a sovereign state: every reader of Wikipedia is invited to read this if they want to read about the Kingdom of Denmark. It is a huge failure therefore if it does not present an adequate description of the Kingdom of Denmark. Kevin McE (talk) 16:55, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
"Denmark" virtually always refers to the European country. The primary topic of this article should be the territory in Europe, per WP:COMMONNAME. This is why your revised lead was misguided and incorrect. Greenland and the Faroe Islands are not parts of Denmark. If you want to split up this article then the best solution is the re-creation of a Kingdom of Denmark article. This would be comparable to the Netherlands/Kingdom of the Netherlands situation. I think should make a formal proposal further down this page. I won't be supporting any separation; the entire issue seems pedantic to me . -- Hazhk (talk) 11:53, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
Also to me. Denmark is Denmark - sometimes that means "realm" more often it means "country/nation". Both needs to be covered in the same article.·maunus · snunɐɯ· 12:19, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
Asserting the difference between a European territory with a temperate climate, smaller than the Dominican Republic, and a transcontinental sovereign state bigger than Mexico and the UK added incorporating vast areas of arctic wilderness, is far from pedantic. It is impossible to meaningfully discuss the geography, climate, fauna, constitution, monarchy or innumerable other aspects of Denmark, it is meaningless to do so without clarifying which meaning of Denmark is the scope of the article. Mnaus's comment casts doubt on your confidence about the primary meaning: establishing COMMONNAM E is likely to be contentious.Kevin McE (talk) 18:57, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
No, it is in fact fairly simple: the scope is the realm/state but the focus is the country/nation. Any semi-competent wikieditor should be able to write the article without having to split the two or causing confusion.·maunus · snunɐɯ· 19:14, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
I don't see any consensus for changing the focus of this article from the European country. Denmark means Denmark, not a transcontinental state. Can you show otherwise? To reiterate, I think there's a possible case for renaming the Danish Realm article to Kingdom of Denmark, fleshing it out, and focusing on the Kingdom of Denmark as a sovereign state. However I don't fully support that move. Having reviewed the discussion in 2012 about merging the two articles, I am still convinced that the current situation is best. If you're trying to propose such a split of the article then you need to create a new section and get a wider response that three or four people. Until then I don't think there's anything further to discuss; there's no consensus for any change because you are the only one supporting it.--Hazhk (talk) 19:24, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
Manaus' comment, "the scope is the realm/state" shows that Denmark does not clearly mean, exclusively and clearly, what you evidently think it means; "Denmark means Denmark", which is the name of a transcontinental state. If "the scope is the realm/state", then the lede must address that scope, and the current lede is inappropriate, and this discussion does not reflect consensus for your reverting of my edit. Kevin McE (talk) 07:08, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
Clearly noone has been in agreement with your edit. So maybe you should switch strategy to try to build consensus instead of trying to deductively demonstrate that you are right and everyone else is wrong.·maunus · snunɐɯ· 07:18, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
@Kevin McE: I think your whole idea (which it is) that the country of Denmark comprise Denmark proper, the Faroe Islands and Greenland altogether, needs to be confronted in a seperate post here, as it is a singular issue that needs to be cleared up before any other consensus or progress can be made in other areas. What do you base your idea on? I can inform you that both the Faroese people and the Greenlanders would be very surprised to hear that they now live in Denmark and not ... The Faroe Islands and Greenland, respectively. But more importantly, do you automatically suggest that the Faroe Islands and Greenland is described in full detail in this article about "Denmark" too? i.e. that these articles are merged in to this one? Because that would be the consequence of your idea. RhinoMind (talk) 14:26, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
I don't know whether you are not intelligent enough to understand what I have written, or deliberately misinterpreting it. I have consistently distinguished between the state and the constituent country. According to our article, Faroese and Greenlanders will look at their passports and see that they are Danish, albeit with qualification: they live in what is commonly called Denmark, but but not within the constituent country that (confusingly) has the same name. I cannot for the life of me imagine why you think it is a bad idea for an encyclopaedia to have an article on a sovereign nation. The word 'country' is very poorly defined: in most countries of the world, there is not meaningful between country, nation and sovereign state: in some cases, including Denmark, Netherlands, France and the UK, that is not the case. I have been consistent in avoiding the word 'country' except in the phrase 'constituent country'; when referring to the sovereign state, I have not once used the word country, and I fail to see how you would justify saying otherwise.
If you object to this article being edited to reflect the reality of the sovereign state, sometimes known as the Kingdom of Denmark (although very rarely in the language of this encyclopaedia), which has every link relevant to it as a whole directed here, then you have no moral option other than to provide another article that such links should point to. Kevin McE (talk) 22:13, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
For the record Faroese and Greenlandic people do not have the same passports as Danes from Denmark, though they have Danish nationality. The article however already clearly defines both the country and the state and describes the differences between them, and even the infoboxmap includes both a map of the realm and one of the country.·maunus · snunɐɯ· 02:16, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
Links could point to a newly re-created Kingdom of Denmark article, or the existing Danish Realm? Perhaps we could reshape the Danish Realm article into a short article outlining the politics and legal reality of the sovereign state as opposed to the European country; however, any information about geography, history, culture, etc. must belong in the articles of the respective countries that make up the Realm. We can't duplicate information across three articles to such a large degree. I suggested a situation similar to Kingdom of the Netherlands - which describes the sovereign state, but not the Netherlands - but you apparently ignored that suggestion. Frankly, you're being obstinate and avoiding any suggestions or solutions for a way forward. You are the one who needs to come up with a proposal that doesn't change the topic of this article. -- Hazhk (talk) 23:01, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
Perhaps have a skim through articles that link here and see which ones obviously refer to the European country and which refer to the sovereign state. Also see the links pointing to Kingdom of Denmark. You will see that the European country is the primary topic. Therefore your proposal needs to focus on creating a new article (or renaming Danish Realm) where technical matters relating to a sovereign state can be outlined. --Hazhk (talk) 23:18, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
@Kevin McE I think you overlooked my previous comment on your previous entry above, so I have inserted a ping to notice you. As stated there I am convinced that three articles are needed. Namely article on "The Kingdom of Denmark", "Denmark" (which is Denmark proper) and "The Danish Realm" (which is synonymous with "The Unity of The Realm"). I am not entirely sure which one of these entities you are referring to as "the sovereign state", but I guess it must be The Danish Realm, if I take your geographical arguments into account. RhinoMind (talk) 09:47, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
And that is what I have been saying all along: there must be separate and distinct articles on the constituent country (Denmark proper/European Denmark) and the sovereign state (Kingdom of Denmark): I also believe that a wider survey might be needed to establish which of these is best placed at Denmark. It is probably indeed appropriate to have separate articles on the legal processes and documents (which is the way that the current article at Danish Realm is presented): it will definitely be appropriate to review, as Hazhk suggests, what links point where. What is definitely not appropriate, and the whole point of my intervention here, is having a unitary sovereign state made up of three constituent countries have any reference to it in this encyclopaedia directed to one of those countries, an article whose editors are resistant to making it be suitable as a redirect for those numerous links. Kevin McE (talk) 18:48, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
Oh, then some in-depth debate appears to be fruitful after all. As I see it, the most straight forward approach right now would be to initiate an article about "The Kingdom of Denmark". As it is, it just redirects (as you also points out) to this "Denmark (proper)" article, which is wrong for many reasons, including purely geographical reasons.
Another point I would like to stress in relation to this, is that "The Danish Realm" article messes up a bit with "The Kingdom of Denmark" and use it almost like a synonym to "The Danish Realm". There are some overlaps, especially when it comes to geography, but they are not synonymous terms. I tried to fix some of the mess-ups on that page earlier, even drawing from sources and references already in the article, but about 60% of my efforts was destroyed by other users subsequently. I don't know their reasons exactly, as I didn't had the energy and time to argue about it on the TalkPage there, but now you guys (and future editors) have been warned that attempts to seperate, filter out and elaborate on "The Kingdom of Denmark" in relation to "The Danish Realm" could be another "up-the-hill" task. RhinoMind (talk) 19:21, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
The primary topic of Denmark is clearly and unequivocally the European country - the articlehowever of course needs to describe the fact that this country has overseas possessions that are part of the sovereign state by the same name. Perhaps a separate article on the "rigsfællesskab" is warranted, but it is by no means the primary topic of "Denmark" - neither in Danish nor in English and WP policy simply would not permit that. Personally I doubt very much that a separate article on the rigsfællesskab is useful - anything of relevance can easily be described within the article on "Denmark".·maunus · snunɐɯ· 12:14, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
The rigsfællesskab is covered in Danish Realm. That article was formerly titled rigsfællesskabet. --Hazhk (talk) 16:20, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
Note: Rigsfællessskabet translates as "The Unity of The Realm". It is synonymous with "The Danish Realm". RhinoMind (talk) 17:35, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

Hi. This is for everybody reading this. I have collected some informative and useful links that I wanted to provide and share here too. This whole issue is lacking in sound basic references, so I hope to make up for this. Some are in English, but I hope you can read a bit of Danish too?

About The Unity of The Realm and The Danish Realm. Translated English version here.
About The Unity of The Realm.
It is currently being broadcast across The Danish Realm and I can highly recommend it. There is a summary in English here.
About the differencies between Denmark and The Danish Realm.
About the meaning of Denmark and The Kingdom of Denmark.

RhinoMind (talk) 15:41, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

Health in Denmark[edit]

I suggest Health in Denmark to be deleted and/or merged into this article. The Health in Denmark article has little potential to become more than a few alinea, which are already present in this article.

Pieceofmetalwork (talk) 16:34, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

I haven't had a thorough look into the article Health in Denmark specifically, but the health care system in Denmark is unique and worth an article of its own. Also the health profile has some notable features. The cancer statistics is one example. RhinoMind (talk) 15:49, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 11 external links on Denmark. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:09, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

Assistance needed for adding Denmark's official name[edit]

I have been trying to add Denmark's official name, Kingdom of Denmark, but a user called Materialscientist keeps reverting it. I don't have administrative rights, so I cant block him from continuing doing this. I'm aware of the talks relating Denmark proper and Denmark (state), but this article is clearly about the independent country of Denmark (with the official name, Kingdom of Denmark) as there are references to military, politics and history etc. I know it can be difficult differentiating between Denmark and Denmark proper but this is seriously getting out of hand and its time to use facts and not personal beliefs --Kisualk (talk) 19:24, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

The Kingdom of Denmark comprise all of The Danish Realm, not just Denmark proper. For historical reasons. I think that explains your problem here. RhinoMind (talk) 22:43, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Here is a quick reference that have been used previously on this TalkPage too: [1] RhinoMind (talk) 22:48, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Yes, that shows my point fairly well. Denmark normally refers to Denmark proper (Jutland, Funen, Zealand etc.) but formally also include Greenland and the Faroe Islands. I will add Denmark's official name then if there are no objections--Kisualk (talk) 11:35, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

The official name has been added.--Kisualk (talk) 10:38, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Please do not make bold changes without establishing some kind of consensus on this page. You had the audacity to request I bring the matter to this page? I suggest you read previous discussions in the archives. -- Hazhk (talk) 22:21, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
The changes were made by Norrild1 at 10:32, 5 February 2017. There have been no objections after RhinoMind provided a link to the official Danish website, denmark.dk, which states Denmark and the Kingdom of Denmark are the same. There should be no difference between the Danish WP country page and the Norwegian or the Finnish country page etc. regarding the common and official country name.--Kisualk (talk) 10:38, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
"...which states Denmark and the Kingdom of Denmark are the same." This is NOT what the page and link I provided says. The ref states that The Danish Realm and The Kingdom of Denmark is the same geographically speaking. Please read refs before citing or using them. Btw.: Generally speaking, denmark.dk is not a completely solid and thoroughly reliable source and a better one should be digged up when possible. Just noting, as it has been used in articles. RhinoMind (talk) 16:55, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
I have indeed read the ref. The key words are "Yet", "also" and "belong". However I do have a question. As there are some that argue Denmark's official name is not the Kingdom of Denmark, it would be great to know, what these people think Denmark's official name then is? And what do they think the Kingdom of Denmark actually is?--Kisualk (talk) 13:41, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Denmark is the name of lots of stuff. A country for one thing, a kingdom for another, and also a town in the state of Georgia.·maunus · snunɐɯ· 11:52, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

Perhaps the Netherlands versus the Kingdom of the Netherlands article gives some insight how to move forward; as that situation seems somewhat similar to the Danish situation. The current article appears somewhat ambiguous as at some places it is limited to Denmark proper (e.g. locator map) while at others it seems to refer to the entire Danish Realm. Perhaps splitting of some of the Danish Realm stuff into that article and clarify the difference might help? The Kingdom of Denmark would then obviously refer to the whole realm not the Denmark (proper) constituency alone. Arnoutf (talk) 14:30, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

That a blatant error/nonsense went undetected for a period doesn't mean it stands. The current revision is correct and any reversion will make the article less accurate and intentionally mislead readers. The debate is not over the official name of the sovereign state, it's over the name of the European county, which does not include Greenland or the Faroes. -- Hazhk (talk) 21:06, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Kisualk are you completlely obtuse? If you acknowledge that Greenland and the Faroe Islands are part of a sovereign state called the "Kingdom of Denmark" then you must surely acknowledge that this sovereign state is not a European country? Please explain to my how the lead is/was inaccurate. The burden is entirely on you to explain what you want. I will continue to revert until the article is locked or I'm blocked. I refuse to see a gross inaccurate statement at the very top of an article I have contributed greatly too. --Hazhk (talk) 11:44, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Yes, Denmark is still an European and a Scandinavian country even though Greenland and the Faroe's are situated in the North Atlantic. USA is also a North American country even though the state of Hawaii is situated in the South West Pacific.
Please tone it done a notch, this is not a particularly important issue. It really just is about mentioning Denmark the country, and then noting the existence of a state/realm/kingdom with a few more constituent countries. The primary topic of the article called "Denmark" is the country, then we can have another article about the kingdom and give it a subsection in this one. Keep it simple.·maunus · snunɐɯ· 11:50, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
There are already references to Greenland and the Faroe Islands as well as to the Unity of the Realm, where Greenland's and the Faroe's legal status in Denmark are explained. There is no reason to make people more confused by removing Denmark's official name. Finland's page is a good example. Perhaps we should insert an explanation, that Denmark is both the common name for the independent country of Denmark, including Greenland and the Faroe's, as well as it is used in daily parlance for the region of Denmark ("rigsdelen"), which does not include Greenland and the Faroe's.--Kisualk (talk) 11:55, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
I have edited the lead now so it is less confusing. It still needs more details such as the total area but what do you think of this version?--Kisualk (talk) 12:09, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
I think it is wrong. "The Kingdom of Denmark" is the official name of the state, not the country.·maunus · snunɐɯ· 12:49, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
The Kingdom of Denmark is in fact the official name of Denmark as it is seen here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_sovereign_states. It would make no sense if Denmark had no official name. I have taken the liberty of writing to the Prime Minister's Office for confirmation of the following: Denmark is an independent country and a sovereign state, Denmark's official name is the Kingdom of Denmark and Denmark (common) and the Kingdom of Denmark (official) are the names of the Danish state.--Kisualk (talk) 14:15, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
It would have made more sense if your question didn't already confuse the two entities in the way you phrased it. The correct question would be "What is the official name of the country Denmark, and is it different from the name of the sovereign state and Kingdom of Denmark?"·maunus · snunɐɯ· 14:19, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────Your comparison with Finland does not make sense as Finland (proper) is the only domain of the Republic of Finland, while Greenland and the Faroer are part of the Kingdom of Denmark, but not of Denmark proper. Arnoutf (talk) 16:59, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

Similar to Denmark, Finland does in fact include a self-governing country, the Åland Islands.--Kisualk (talk) 17:43, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
No it's not similar, at least not in the Wiki article as the Finland article AND locator maps is inclusive of the Aland Islands, while the Denmark article and locator maps puts Faroer and Greenland to the side. Either this article should be rewritten to be inclusive of Greenland and Faroer at all places, or there is a difference between Denmark and the Realm. Arnoutf (talk) 17:46, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
The Åland Islands have the same status in Finland as the Faroe Islands and Greenland have in Denmark. That is why I think the Finnish country page is a good example on how to do it. It's clean and simple and not confusing. I totally agree with you that the map on the Danish country page should include the Faroe's and Greenland. However I don't think the change will be accepted before we get confirmation from the Prime Minister's Office that Denmark is the sovereign state. That is actually how it was before the Danish page started be such a mess. The page already includes Greenland and the Faore's in many places and have references to detailed descriptions of them as well as to the Unity of Realm, Danish: "Rigsfællesskabet", which further describes the devolution of powers from the parliament to the local elected assemblies on the Faroes Islands and Greenland. You can say the scope of the Danish page is Denmark but the focus is Denmark proper which is similar to the Finnish page. This is also in accordance with how Danes normally refer to Denmark. Formally speaking we know (or should know) that Denmark includes Greenland and the Faroe's but in line of respect for the Unity of Realm we don't say that in daily use. In other words the country of Denmark is both the common name for the Kingdom of Denmark (formally) and Denmark proper (daily use) which is why it is so important that this page is correct to avoid confusion.--Kisualk (talk) 10:40, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
I don't think the type of status is the same actually - Greenland is an autonomous country within the Kingdom since 2009, it is no longer a self-governance area.·maunus · snunɐɯ· 11:01, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
And we come back again to my earlier suggestion that the Netherlands (proper) versus Kingdom of the Netherlands is very similar. As with Denmark most Dutch mean Netherlands proper when they refer to the Netherlands but the Kingdom also includes the overseas countries. The two different Wikipedia pages make that clear and make us avoid the mess the Denmark article is in right now. Arnoutf (talk) 16:59, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
An area or region with a self-government is the same as an autonomous country. It's semantics. Greenland didn't change it's status from an "area" to a "country" in 2009. The Self-government Act of 2009 simply replaced Greenland's Home Rule Arrangement from 1979. The Åland Islands have a national football team same as Greenland. When I go to the Netherlands country page I'm left with the expression, that the Netherlands is a country but not a sovereign state. To my knowledge the Netherlands is indeed a sovereign state. The Netherlands as well as Denmark are members of the EU which is a confederation, an union of sovereign states. If you don't believe me, please look here: https://europa.eu/european-union/about-eu/countries/member-countries_en. In my opinion, if you find it meaningful to separate the Netherlands proper from the state of the Netherlands, I would have used France as an example. France exits as a common WP country page as well as a page describing the term metropolitan France. It works very well for Denmark to do the same. Keep the Danish country page in accordance with WP's common practice and the page, which needs to be renamed back to "the Unity of the Realm", with a description of the Unity of Realm.--Kisualk (talk) 13:16, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
No it is not. Greenland worked for twenty years to become autonomous country instead of an self-governing region, and the 2009 change was a major political change for Greenland. The status of Ålandsøerne is very different and not comparable, even comparison with the Faroe islands may be unwarranted.·maunus · snunɐɯ· 13:21, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
Please do tell how you find the status of the Åland Islands differs from Greenland or the Faroe's? As I see it, the only difference is that EU law apply to Åland, although it is a separate customs area. People on Greenland would be very unhappy to hear you don't think of Greenland as a country prior to 2009. Greenland's national football team played their first match in 1980 so perhaps you could explain what you mean by "country" and "region" if Home Rule is not enough to be considered a country?--Kisualk (talk) 13:43, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
Your comparison would work if, and only if, the Denmark article includes Greenland and Faroer in ALL its references (as the Finland article does with Aland). The simple fact that the locator map of Denmark does not colour Greenland already is irrefutable evidence the Wikipedia articles of Finland and Denmark take a different position. That simple fact makes your comparison fatally flawed. Arnoutf (talk) 18:15, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
Perhaps I don't understand you correctly, but the Danish page has many references to Greenland and The Faroe Islands in the relevant areas. It's quit evident when you search through the page for Greenland or the Faroe's. Actually the Danish page has more references to it's autonomous regions than Finland has to the Åland Islands. Even in the info box there are many notes detailing Greenland and the Faroe's. I agree that there should be included a map of the entire Danish state. I will try add this map https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Danish_Realm#/media/File:Kingdom_of_Denmark_(orthographic_projection).svg in the same way Norway uses two maps. Kisualk (talk) 20:34, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Total area added. Map still needed to be added--Kisualk (talk) 10:20, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Greenland and the Faroe Islands are NOT part of Denmark[edit]

This is not disputable. They are part of the sovereign state called the 'Kingdom of Denmark' or Danish Realm. Consider the confusion when we state that Greenland is part of 'Denmark' and in the following sentence state "Denmark has a total area of 42,924 square kilometres (16,573 sq mi)". Which is it then? Does Denmark actually have a total area of over 1 million square kilometers? I think we know the answer. This is why I have reverted because the assertion is so ridiculous that it brings the entire article into disrepute. 81.141.245.199 (talk) 12:57, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

The article Danish Realm states, "The term Danish Realm ... refers to the relationship between Denmark proper, the Faroe Islands and Greenland—'three countries constituting the Kingdom of Denmark." (my emphasis added). 81.141.245.199 (talk) 13:01, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

The geography section reads, "Located in Northern Europe, Denmark consists of the peninsula of Jutland and 443 named islands (1,419 islands above 100 square metres (1,100 sq ft) in total)." This excludes Greenland and the Faroe Islands too. 81.141.245.199 (talk) 13:05, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Yes. This has been an issue for this page for a long time. Just scroll up and read a few posts, a lot of them relate to this particular issue. Some people keeps changing things back and forth on and on. I am absolutely with you, even if this issue doesn't really need cheering, but only a simple basic implementation in line with reality (and the sources).
However, from the previous "debates" up above, I think I can now understand how the problem emerged in the first place (and keep emerging): In some constitutions and political associations, The Kingdom of Denmark (KoD) is mentioned as a sovereign state and country for some reason and not just "Denmark". This has spurred some editors to believe that this page should describe the entire "country" of KoD and not just Denmark (or Denmark proper as it is often called to avoid any ambiguity). But this page describes Denmark proper in every aspect and not KoD. Geographically, economically, culturally, politically, etc. this page discribes Denmark proper and not The KoD. Noone wanted to initiate a new and separate article on the KoD specifically and describe things there, but instead they keep redirecting KoD to either this page or the Danish Realm page, both of which are wrong solutions that doesn't fix anything.
I have been working a little bit on the Danish Realm page to describe The KoD there (loosely) and the similarites and differencies between the two as well, but there is much more to be done. I believe this is the way out of this long standing mess.
Just wanted to let you know. RhinoMind (talk) 15:30, 8 May 2017 (UTC)