Talk:Denotified Tribes

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from Talk:Denotified tribes of India)
Jump to: navigation, search

Clarity needed[edit]

I am not clear if the denotified tribes were renotified in 1959 under Habitual offenders act. So, was it just a change in nomenclature? --Gurubrahma 13:11, 26 November 2005 (UTC)

I think they were virtually renotified, although the terms of the new law were less harsh. Even the Habitual Offenders Act was amended in the 90s, so I don't know what's the latest situation. deeptrivia 14:45, 26 November 2005 (UTC)

The lastest situation is these communites are now enumerated and classified into Schedule castes, Schedule Tribes and Other Backward Classes. That causes a huge problem, as these communites are entitled to get benefits as they should be. The study of these communities should done by keeping colonialism in mind and the impact of colonialism in creation these communites. I as am doing my dissertation on them, I will write more about them. Rahul

Yes, the HOA contained virtually the same language as the CTA, but they were enacted at the state level, not the national level. Since the rise of the DNT rights movement in the 1990s HOAs have been repealed in most states. In some places this has led to real reforms, but in others the policies are still in effect even if they are no longer written in law. kerim (talk) 08:03, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

DNT vs. DNT-NT[edit]

Not sure how we should deal with this, but DNTs are usually lumped together with Nomadic Tribes, and I've seen various interpretations of DNT, where the N sometimes stands for Nomadic, and sometimes for Notified. When it stands for notified you see the abbreviation DNT-NT used for "Denotified and Nomadic Tribes." In any case, these connections need to be clearly spelled out and there should be a page for the category of DNT-NT which is linked to this page. (Thanks to everyone working on this page!) kerim (talk) 08:03, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Removal of unsourced info[edit]

The info in the lead was marked as unsourced since October 2009. WP:V requires that all statements which are not "common sense" need to be verified. That information was contentious, and thus must have a source. If anyone can find a source, feel free to re-add it. Qwyrxian (talk) 02:34, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was moved. --BDD (talk) 16:52, 28 September 2012 (UTC) (non-admin closure)

Denotified tribes of IndiaDenotified TribesDenotified Tribes (DNT) is a technical term, while this lowercased title appears to apply to "tribes in India which happen to be denotified". I submit it should reflect the formal term, since there's no Disambiguation issue currently. MatthewVanitas (talk) 22:20, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

  • Support. There is no ambiguity. —  AjaxSmack  00:38, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Improve this article[edit]

For an article on an important, but little-known human rights issue (outside of India), let's get this article coherent !!! (talk) 03:49, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Denotified Tribes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:40, 8 September 2017 (UTC)