From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Wikipedia Version 1.0 Editorial Team / v0.7 (Rated C-class)
WikiProject iconThis article has been reviewed by the Version 1.0 Editorial Team.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the quality scale.
Checklist icon
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
Note icon
This article is within of subsequent release version of Language and literature.
Taskforce icon
This article has been selected for Version 0.7 and subsequent release versions of Wikipedia.

4300 ligatures etc and some serious WP:OR[edit]

All this zillion compounding and ligatures based on someone's OR and as source is WP:Undue, shall I say highly undue. That is not how Devanagari has been or is in mainstream use. I do not understand the rationale for including any of this fluff in this encyclopedic article per wikipedia community agreed guidelines. If someone has reasons, or a source, let us discuss them please. Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 17:58, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

There should be at least an explanation of the term[edit]

The article gives some explanations to the second part of the name, telling that nagari means something like civic script. What deva stands for, i.e. divine, is not said. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:16B8:467C:EA00:2DD6:DCCC:CD7B:E12B (talk) 18:58, 25 November 2018 (UTC)


The introductory paragraph says this script has a preference for rounded symmetrical shapes, yet none of the characters shown is in anyways symmetrical. Unless there is a different idea about what symmetry is than I have. Wschart (talk) 17:42, 30 November 2018 (UTC)

‎Biconsonantal conjuncts?[edit]

Why were the biconsonantal conjunt tables removed? This was the only place on the web I had found a detailed list of the main conjuncts in proper unicode. Can the deletion of these be undone? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:E000:4DC2:1500:8D25:893F:4B3E:434B (talk) 21:00, 8 January 2019 (UTC)