Talk:Didot (typeface)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Typography (Rated Stub-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Typography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Typography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Stub-Class article Stub  This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
 

Theano Didot[edit]

Could someone include a section on Theano Didot? If you do , could you add a link to the section within Template:Free and open-source typography? -- 12.218.76.10 (talk) 10:23, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

Couple of changes[edit]

I'd just like to warn about a couple of misconceptions people have about Didone fonts:

  • Dazzle happens particularly in fonts not intended to be used at small print sizes. Century Schoolbook is an example of a Didone font with the basic Didone structure, but beefed up for use in body text. It's not a flaw in early digital fonts so much as by people using them for a purpose they weren't intended for. (Most Didot digitisations intended for body text cost - often a lot- but Libre Bodoni, Computer Modern and versions of Century Schoolbook are free but in the same basic genre for the experimenter.)
  • Frutiger's Didot doesn't quite have optical sizes - just a headline font with no italic. Apparently at the time developing fonts was so time-consuming it was decided not to create a full set of optical sizes, but it was at least considered. Blythwood (talk) 07:21, 13 January 2016 (UTC)