Die Elenden sollen essen, BWV 75 is within the scope of , which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to WikiProject Classical music classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.
This article is supported by
. Compositions task force
This article is within the scope of , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of WikiProject Germany Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
GA This article has been rated as
GA-Class on the project's quality scale.
Low This article has been rated as
Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
GA Review [ edit ]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Die Elenden sollen essen, BWV 75/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Dr. Blofeld ( talk · contribs) 21:48, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
Tomorrow.♦ 21:48, 7 June 2015 (UTC) Dr. Blofeld
Rep of ambitious
"expands the contrast " -doesn't seem right here, try "illustrates" or "exaggerates" or something
The contrast is given by the biblical quote, he expands the thoughts, - better wording welcome. --GA
Tim riley Any thoughts? Perhaps you can also provide some pointers here..♦ 16:59, 8 June 2015 (UTC) Dr. Blofeld
I think if you make it "expands on" rather than just "expands" it will read very well.
17:29, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
Tim riley talk
Thank you, tried ---GA
Thomaskantor and link in first instance in Background. Also why is one in Italics and not the other?
Linked in lede and on first occurrence in body now, all italic, --GA
Again "expands the contrast" and rep of "The poet expands"
"non-Leipzig paper" -what is that? Is Leipzig paper special or something?
Musicologists know the (different) kind of paper used in Leipzig vs. what Bach used in Köthen, - better wording welcome. --GA
Just a list, not your usual summary? Couldn't you find anything in detail on each part?
Will be a table - after Nielsen ;) --GA
Watch ] here : chorale cantata]s
thank you, fixed --GA
A source for selecting recordings would be useful at the top.
Do you mean for criteria of selection? --
Gerda Arendt ( talk) 10:36, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
I mean add the citation link after "A list of recordings is provided by Aryeh Oron on the Bach-Cantatas website."
Made the source an inline citation, ---
Gerda Arendt ( talk) 17:42, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:
MoS compliance: Is it
factually accurate and ?
A. References to sources:
B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
No original research: Is it
broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:
Fair representation without bias:
No edit wars, etc:
contain to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have
fair use rationales: B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with
Pass or Fail:
I was waiting to see if
Tim riley had some further points beyond my own but this looks passable now, good work.♦ 09:04, 10 June 2015 (UTC) Dr. Blofeld