Talk:Digital wallet

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Numismatics / Cryptocurrency  (Rated Start-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Numismatics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Numismatics articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Cryptocurrency task force (marked as Mid-importance).
 
WikiProject Electronics (Rated Start-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is part of WikiProject Electronics, an attempt to provide a standard approach to writing articles about electronics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Leave messages at the project talk page
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

Untitled[edit]

I think the article should mention that e-wallets have TOTALLY FAILED TO HAPPEN. The idea never took of. It was never adopted.

The above comment is only true with a very limited definition of "digital wallets", which this article supports. I think the article's definition of the term is far too narrow. Digital wallets do not have to be merely software applications for PCs, as this article implies. The term "digital wallet" has been used in the press now for a while to refer to smartphones that enable people to store all their cards digitally and make purchases via near-field communication (NFC) or some other contactless protocol. Example article: http://brandimposter.com/iphone-5-can-not-be-the-digital-wallet-20118485.html

These contactless phone-based digital wallets have also been called "mobile wallets" and "wallet phones" or "Osaifu-Keitai" in Japan.

Please discuss. 142.151.170.148 (talk) 20:04, 22 April 2011 (UTC)


Under Section:

Advantages for e-commerce sites

Upwards of 25% of online shoppers abandon their order due to frustration in filling in forms. (Graphic Arts Monthly, 1999) The digital wallet combats this problem by giving users the option to transfer their information securely and accurately. This simplified approach to completing transactions results in better usability and ultimately more utility for the customer.

Should this research be updated? It is 10 years old. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jimbo314 (talkcontribs) 23:33, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

Minds@Work Digital Wallet[edit]

I agree that this article is too narrow. It fails to mention the Digital Wallet, a battery powered storage device for digital photos. This website even says that Minds@Work have the term as a registered trade mark, though I can't find any trace of the company any more, so perhaps that is invalid. In any case, I think it should at least be mentioned.

Davidmaxwaterman (talk) 06:00, 27 July 2012 (UTC)


xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2013.08.23

Gostaria de saber porque todas as vezes que se coloca uma informação a en.wikipedia.org deleta revertidas sonegando informações, repetindo SONEGANDO informações a seus usuários. Todas as informações que coloco são fotografadas e estou fazendo um arquivo para serem publicadas em jornais inclusive os Talk postados como este. Sabemos que estas desculpas de falta informação e só faz de conta para ter motivos para a reversão. Será que é em favor de grupos? Não adianta sonegarem existe outros meios que desmentem a Wikípédia que esta saindo da verdadeira meta que é ser respeitada tenho certeza que pessoas de um outro escalão da Wikipédia vão concordar estes que reverte deveria pesquisara veracidade do fato. E repito é um fato histórico, se não eu não estaria perdendo meu tempo em postar. Caso esta informação que vou repetir é histórica com fontes confiáveis não seja incluída onde as postei, não vou mais corrigir erros absurdos com já corrigi, vou fotografar a pagina e colocar no You Tube e outros sites mostrando a incapacidade de seus revisores mostrar que se en.wikipedia.org não mudar seu estilo de reverter assuntos verdadeiros.

Tentei, tentei e tentei. Sempre ajudei anonimamente concertar erros para não tirar a credibilidade de uma grande idéia. Mas parece que os revisores da en.wikipedia.org querem derrubá-la mesmo.

Tenho o histórico de tudo fotografado.

Até pedi para este tal de Ton Brasvetico publicar e mesmo assim vocês tiraram.

Então já vi que vocês não estudaram o caso foi nada! Só Fizeram um faz de conta que discutiram.

Que vergonha!

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx — Preceding unsigned comment added by 177.3.8.76 (talk) 19:55, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

Universal card[edit]

Universal card is a new article accepted by WP:AFC. Reviewers recognised the potential to merge this content into Digital wallet or Magnetic stripe card. I believe this is a determination that can be made by the editors of these articles. ~KvnG 19:34, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

Reads like an advertisement[edit]

This article talks about the advantages of digital wallets without ever mentioning the problems with them. It has no information about acceptance rates. It reads like an ad for the digital wallet industry. In addition, it's quite vague about what the security issues might be, what the range of actions might be that different kinds require of the customer, etc. Basically it's a rather poor summary, at least at the time I read it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.7.11.209 (talk) 23:47, 9 August 2014 (UTC)