Talk:Dimensional regularization

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Physics (Rated Start-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

I removed the comments on the page, stating that the interpretation of dimensional regularization may not be profound and that the geometrical intepretation of partial dimensions is hard. While i may sympathise with those feelings, the first one should be backed up by references, and the second one should not be in an encyclopedia. Siebren 09:58, 14 November 2005 (UTC)

There must be a mistake in the hypersurface formula given as there is no mention of r, the radius, while the formula is clearly stated to be the hypersurface of a sphere of radius r. -- 11:21, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

It would be better if the final integral was evaluated and given an expression in terms of \epsilon. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lathrop (talkcontribs) 01:29, 25 October 2008 (UTC)