Talk:Dinamalar

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject India / Tamil Nadu / Chennai (Rated Stub-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.
Stub-Class article Stub  This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Tamil Nadu (marked as Mid-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Chennai (marked as High-importance).
 
WikiProject Journalism (Rated Stub-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Stub-Class article Stub  This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
 
Note icon
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-Class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.

Dinamalar overtakes Dinathanthi[edit]

How did dinamalar.com attract 202,000 visitors[1] when dailythanthi.com (the market leader offline) could manage only 21,000 visitors[2] in 2008?Anwar (talk) 11:58, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

The user base of Dinamalar and Dinathanthi is vastly different. A tamilian looking for a Tamil Newspaper online would gravitate to Dinamalar rather than thanthi. It is like comparing the WSJ 8 million online vs 2 million physical and TOI 800 thousand online vs 4 million physical. The numbers here are from wiki and siteanalytics. கிருஷ்ணா/Krishna (talk) 10:36, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

Unsourced editorializing in article[edit]

@Wasifwasif:, the source you've got this time is pretty good, but it doesn't state anything about the motives for their publication of the cartoons. Please demonstrate some reliable sources that claim Dinmalar unequivocally published cartoons of Muhammad for reasons of provocation. Furthermore, please read WP:SAWW. The term "Islamic prophet" is to be used once per article. Please refrain from reinserting it multiple times. Dolescum (talk) 17:15, 8 December 2014 (UTC)