Jump to content

Talk:Diocese of Växjö

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Sigfrid's canonization

[edit]

This piece of info that Sigfrid was canonized 1158 is something that Lars-Olof Larsson seems to have been unaware of in his discussion of the origin of the diocese of Växjö ("Det medeltida Värend", 1964). One would assume that the Catholic Encyclopedia might be reliable on this kind of information, but I would like to know more details. Anything that is available. /Pieter Kuiper 20:47, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The diocese template

[edit]

... seems to be intended for Catholic dioceses. Most entries just do not apply to a diocese in the Church of Sweden. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 20:04, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Diocese of Växjö. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:32, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]