From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Climate for Kuwait?![edit]

Why is the climate information based on Kuwait Airport in Kuwait City? The entire climate graphics and chart must be redone. In the meantime, I'm removing the climate chart and editing the data. —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 19:39, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

Nevermind, I updated the data myself. Everything should now be accurate. —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 19:54, 4 December 2010 (UTC)


I'm not sure that Arabic Coffee is a good image for Doha. I'm suggesting it be removed after a week if I don't get any other comments --Matt 04:48, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

Expansion request[edit]

This is no longer a stub, but should probably continue to be expanded. -- Beland 17:20, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

I expanded the article a lot, and have added many new sections - I just completed a section on transport in Doha. Are there any other sections we could possibly add to the article? Amjra 20:10, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:RayyanInterchange.gif[edit]

Nuvola apps important.svg

Image:RayyanInterchange.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:09, 24 January 2008 (UTC)


some info here belongs under qatar not doha. Population seems either wrong or contradictory (refer to cited article). Is it Qatar's or Doha's population that nears one million?--Aniish72 (talk) 13:27, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

Not only is that particular peice of information incorrect, but the satement that suggests that Doha has an excellent road system, seriously, where did you compare it to? Some backwater villiage in the Amazon perhaps? —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 13:02, 5 October 2009 (UTC)


"some consider"? seriously are we still using weasel words? —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 20:57, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed[edit]

One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). The material was copied from: Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Moonriddengirl (talk) 01:02, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

Article reads like an advert[edit]

If any city in the West effectively banned women, as does Doha, that would certainly be covered in the article. Why no mention of it here? Men and women cannot use the same shops at the same time. Why no mention of that? This article reads like a Qatari Travel Advert. It's certainly totally lacking in any remotely critical content. Goalsonly2 (talk) 19:19, 25 December 2010 (UTC)

File:Doha Mosque.jpg Nominated for Deletion[edit]

Icon Now Commons orange.svg An image used in this article, File:Doha Mosque.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Deletion requests June 2011
What should I do?
A discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 15:30, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Doha Sheraton.jpg Nominated for Deletion[edit]

Icon Now Commons orange.svg An image used in this article, File:Doha Sheraton.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Deletion requests June 2011
What should I do?
A discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 16:11, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

Qatar to Host 2023 Women's Islamic Games[edit]

Doha, Qatar wins bid to host the 2023 Women's Islamic Games. — Preceding unsigned comment added by FallandSpringOlympics (talkcontribs) 18:05, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

Article lacking in citations[edit]

I popped onto this article for some info on the city and discovered a disturbing lack of citations, particularly in the History section which contains absolutely none. There are some pretty severe NPOV issues in the writing as well but I'll leave that for another day... as is, in my opinion this is not a reliable article. Jacotto (talk) 14:27, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

Timeline of Doha[edit]

What is missing from the city timeline? Please add relevant content. Thank you. -- M2545 (talk) 12:34, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

Census 2010[edit]

The referenced page lists 5 cities, no list of communities.Xx236 (talk) 13:54, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Was Doha now has a population of 1 million?[edit]

Was the city's population 1 million?-- (talk) 21:02, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

No. the population isn't reached 1 million milestone. Alos the city has no metro area too. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 15:45, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Doha. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:32, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

Proposed merge with AdDawhah[edit]

I gather from the Doha article that the city and municipality are coextensive, though I'm not sure about that. In any event, Doha does mention the municipality, and the new AdDawhah article seems to contradict it, since it gives a population for the entire municipality that's lower than the population of the city alone. Largoplazo (talk) 16:29, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

If you actually go look at a map the of Doha, it goes somewhat outside of the borders of the municipality into other municipalities, that's why the population of the AdDawhah municipality is lower. I think it should be it's own article although it might have the same name as the city and it's about the same size, it's not quite the same thing.TheRealSou (talk) 16:30, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
Ah, OK. In that case, though:
  1. At a minimum, should the name of the other article be changed to Doha Municipality or something like that? Or is it, unlike the city, normally referred to by its Arabic name even in English?
  2. Should material from this article that's about the municipality be moved there?
Largoplazo (talk) 16:53, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
From what I've read it's referred to as AdDawhah, but the change wouldn't matter that much. And yes I think information about the municipality should definitely be moved there. Sorry for the late response. TheRealSou (talk) 20:10, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

I saw no reason for changing the title of this section, which is a discussion of a proposed merger, so I've reverted that. Since it hasn't been closed out with a consensus, and since no changes have been made to either article either to implement a merger or to shift material as you proposed, it seemed premature to remove the merge tags from either of them, so I've restored those as well. Largoplazo (talk) 17:07, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

The reason I removed the merge tags is because I've shown why they should be separate, I felt it was no longer needed. As for the change of this title section, I shouldn't have changed the name but I thought that the title was what added the merger, so my bad on that. I will begin on shifting the information.TheRealSou (talk) 16:21, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
I have now shifted all the information I believe to be relevant to the other article not to this one, you may go over it just to make sure I haven't forgotten anything if you'd like. I'd suggest we now remove the merge tags.TheRealSou (talk) 16:40, 29 January 2017 (UTC)