Talk:Domestic robot

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Robotics (Rated Start-class, High-importance)
WikiProject icon Domestic robot is within the scope of WikiProject Robotics, which aims to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Robotics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page (Talk), where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 High  This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.


The classification of domestic robots is not exhaustive and it is not fully explanatory. It should be re-written by someone who has more knowledge about this subject. Ovidiu pos 10:50, 14 November 2006 (UTC) fck — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 13:59, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

Lots of red links[edit]

In the list of robotic vacuums there are lots of red links and a laundry list of Samsung products. Any objections to pairing it down to the ones that are actually a) on the market and b) have WP pages about them? -- Autopilot (talk) 13:41, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

Stupid Ad Page[edit]

What is this, a commercial? Put your ads somewhere else and put REAL domestic robots on the page instead. Dishwashers are robots. Microwaves are robots. Televisions, toilets, kettles, ovens, freezers, fridges, digital clocks, remote controls, telephones, washing machines, stoves, air conditioners, DVD players, coffee makers, CD players, deep-fryers, and heaps more! Why are you putting steel frizbees on this page? Are the makers paying you? COME ON PEOPLE! --JezzDawga (talk) 09:54, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

The reason the things you mentioned aren't on the page is because those are referred to as machines, not robots. For a more accurate description of a robot see the Wikipedia articles on robots and robotics. The pictures is not of a Frisbee, it is a carpet cleaning robot. Mysterytrey talk 21:21, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

What's with the brand listing domination?[edit]

I can understand the listing of models of domestic robots throughout time and their progress and functions, but this page seems to be little about serious content and more of a list of domestic robot products. This is supposed to be an article informing about the subject, right?

how about adding the geeky technical details and the history of domestic robots etc etc — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 12:34, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

Instead of coming across as an ad page. It should explain the different types of domestic robots, while informing a reader about each. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 20:29, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

-We fixed the summaries so that they don't sound like an advertisement. Would it be appropriate to add one or two examples of different models? Rkwa 20:23, 28 March

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Domestic robot. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:24, 14 December 2016 (UTC)