Talk:Doorways in the Sand

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Novels / Fantasy / Sci-fi (Rated Start-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by Fantasy task force.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by Science fiction task force.

"a unique style of storytelling that sets this work apart from many science fiction novels."

Zelazny was good, and this is a good novel, but unique seems a little optimistic. I'm no expert on styles of storytelling, but I expect someone can find an old master who used it. Midgley 23:56, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

I've watered that down a bit, asserting it is a style and the style sets this novel apart and going on a bit about him experimenting her ean there... Midgley 23:14, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

Seems like the plot summary should mention the Starstone/Speicus in the last part. Milkfish 23:25, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

Indeed it does, so I've inserted that. ChrisWinter 07:11, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Zeb Carter is relevant how exactly?[edit]

Robert A. Heinlein's character Zebadiah J Carter in The Number of the Beast was a perpetual inhabitant of a university, though post-graduate.

Many people are perpetual inhabitants of universities. Is there some other correlation? If not, I suggest this be deleted for irrelevence. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by (talk) 03:05, 17 March 2007 (UTC).

More to the point, it is unlikely on the face of it that a 1976 book would make a reference to a 1980 book partially serialized in 1979, so the statement should not be included without specific evidence. I deleted the entire section, as neither I nor wikipedia (it's a dead link) have heard of the other supposed reference. 13:06, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
RIchard GOrdon's Doctor in the House wahis was 1950s I think had the first example of this story element that I saw, but I suspect it has been used in previous civilisations. Midgley (talk) 21:39, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

"makes communication easy"[edit]

I'm not a terrible nitpicker, I hope, but this line is off. Fred and the starstone communicate when he is drunk becuase it is a symetrical molecule that spans the problem of Fred being right handed and the Starstone being left handed (or one based on L-forms and the other on R-forms). When inverted via the machine the Starstone is completly activated becuase of it's inversion. Previously it had only been partially activated in the presence of a symetrical molecule. Unfortunatly, the change of the stone from an R-form to an L-form, via the machine, coincides with Fred's flip the other way. If only one had flipped things would be fine, but L-starstone is no more able to communicate with R-Fred than R-Starstone could communicate with L-Fred. The social lubricant is still needed. Someone more nerd than I needs to fix this. IF this wasn't an important story point I would ignore it, but, alas, it is. —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 05:46, 16 July 2008 (UTC)