Talk:Waitrose Duchy Organic

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Food and Drink task list:

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

Brands Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

British Royalty Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject British Royalty (a child project of the Royalty and Nobility Work Group), an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to British Royalty on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you should visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.British RoyaltyWikipedia:WikiProject British RoyaltyTemplate:WikiProject British RoyaltyBritish royalty articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Waitrose[edit]

There is no mention of the arrangement with Waitrose as of 2009, this is a significant development in the brands history and ought to be included,
212.140.128.36 (talk) 17:52, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please feel free to add such information if you have it and can provide a cite.--ThePaintedOne (talk) 11:02, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Name[edit]

There is no mention in the article of who came up with the Brand name of "Duchy Originals". Who was it that pitched the brand name to HRH. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.196.255.162 (talk) 12:40, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please feel free to add such information if you have it and can provide a cite.--ThePaintedOne (talk) 09:28, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Controversy[edit]

While the recent claims by Ernst are clearly relevent and notable, they only relate to a single product of Dutchy, the detox herbal remedy, not the entire product line. As far as I know there is no significant controversy about the food or other products. As such it doesnt seem appropriate that more space in the summary is taken up by that one fact than by a description of the company itself. The copy also gave the impression that the whole Dutchy range had been called into question. I created a new 'controversy' section, moved the copy there and clarrified what it was Ernst was critisising--ThePaintedOne (talk) 07:24, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Per previous post, there is no need to put one claim by one scientist about one product into the lead. The majority of Duchy products are completely seperate from this and it was a brief media item. This fact already has a section to itself with a cite and that is more than sufficient.--ThePaintedOne (talk) 11:02, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

New Brand Name 2015[edit]

With the introduction of a new brand name Waitrose Duchy Organic I have renamed the page and updated the contents. I have also replaced the company info box with a brand info box to reflect the fact that the article has not been about the Duchy Originals company itself for some time. Polly Tunnel (talk) 12:49, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Waitrose Duchy Organic. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 06:31, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Waitrose Duchy Organic. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 04:26, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

a company set up by King Charles III?[edit]

Maybe this is British convention, but as a foreigner the wording in the current version sounds anachronistic and confusing to me. The company was set up in 1990 by Prince Charles, not by king C3.

why not write "...a company set up by Prince Charles (now King Charles III) in 1990..." 217.72.221.233 (talk) 07:13, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]