|Dune is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination failed. For older candidates, please check the archive.|
|Dune has been listed as a level-4 vital article in Science. If you can improve it, please do. This article has been rated as Start-Class.|
|This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:|
|Wikipedia CD Selection|
3/12/13: Page claims that northern-most dunes are in Canada, at 59deg north; but the Great Kobuk Sand Dune is ~ 67deg north? (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kobuk_Valley_National_Park). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 18.104.22.168 (talk) 23:06, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
Embryo dune is the phrase I was taught, and I seem to recall seeing in an OCR textbook. The term refers to the newest dune before it has been colonised and become the fore dune. --Steinsky 02:50, 16 Aug 2003 (UTC)
- I think embryo dune could be a real word. The problem I am having is that it was described as being at the swash line (i.e., on the beach, not the dune). I suspect that the sequence you were taught seems to apply to dune systems that are behind a beach that is always advancing seaward. That is the only explain I can think of for the description of succession as if it were laid out on a sequence of dunes. That seems to me to be atypical. The youngest dunes are typically not the ones nearest the sea with the oldest ones furthest inland, except that the near ones might be disturbed by the sea more frequently and therefore less advanced in their succession. But I'm certainly not knowledgeable enough with all dune systems to say there are not systems in the world exactly as you describe them. At some point we will need to differentiate between the types. -- Marshman 16:59, 16 Aug 2003 (UTC)
--mav 06:44, 27 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Dune by Frank Herbert
When I searched Dune I was looking for an article about the sci-fi work by Frank Herbert, not the geographical formations. Could there possibly be a disambiguation page for this? What the ----?
The page is getting crowded with pictures, would you like me to put some in a gallery?
Vernon, whenvbjvb hjhen.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dune&diff=169426247&oldid=169345107 this edit], which was actually mine? Working with that assumption, I did leave a note, specifically "dab header (the 'for other uses' bit at the top) covers one (your addition)". I apologize if that was unclear, but the attempt was made. -Bbik★ 22:39, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
wikipedia is basicly not telling me enough information about dunes. all the information that was givin to me was mixed up unorganized unimportant junk. come on i see why my teachers tell me that this website is fake with fake information and fake everything —Preceding unsigned comment added by 22.214.171.124 (talk) 18:44, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
Layout Cleanup Needed
Not sure how to do it (effectively), but could someone reflow the text and images for readability? It's tough with all the jumps in the text. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 126.96.36.199 (talk) 13:25, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
In this (and other articles), the term 'Stationary Dune' is used but not defined. Could somebody with the appropriate background please provide a formal definition in the appropriate location. Whatthefat (talk) 19:00, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
While linking in from elsewhere, discovered this page gives a definition for megaripples which implies they are always submarine. This is clearly not true - there's famously megaripples on Mars, for instance - but I don't have the specific knowledge to replace it with anything else. See also Ripple_marks#Wave-formed_ripple_marks. IIRC is the process distinction between megaripples and dunes due to with the scaling of the feature to the particle step length and/or the flow boundary layer (ripples have boundary layer detachment at the crest and a vortex on the lee side; dunes don't)? DanHobley (talk) 14:22, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, New Scientist has confirmed my suspicions. It's all about the interaction with the boundary layer. Ripples only disturb the flow near to the bed; dunes perturb the flow much more deeply. http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20227034.800-largest-megaripples-on-earth-discovered.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by DanHobley (talk • contribs) 14:32, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
Move discussion in progress
There is a move discussion in progress which affects this page. Please participate at Talk:Dune (disambiguation) - Requested move and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RM bot 16:20, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
Planets around Arrakis
SBaker43 (talk) 05:42, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
- dune (sand)
- dune (geology)
- sand dune
Pictures/diagrams of each dune type
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Dune. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120913013557/http://www.southshorejournal.org:80/index.php/issues/volume-1-2006/78-journals/vol-1-2006/117-alice-gray-dorothy-buell-and-naomi-svihla-preservationists-of-ogden-dunes to http://www.southshorejournal.org/index.php/issues/volume-1-2006/78-journals/vol-1-2006/117-alice-gray-dorothy-buell-and-naomi-svihla-preservationists-of-ogden-dunes
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160101021140/http://www.southshorejournal.org/index.php/issues/volume-3-2009/83-journals/vol-3-2009/75-the-historical-roots-of-the-nature-conservancy-in-the-northwest-indianachicagoland-region-from-science-to-preservation to http://www.southshorejournal.org/index.php/issues/volume-3-2009/83-journals/vol-3-2009/75-the-historical-roots-of-the-nature-conservancy-in-the-northwest-indianachicagoland-region-from-science-to-preservation
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at
You may set the
|checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting
|needhelp= to your help request.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
If you are unable to use these tools, you may set
|needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.