Talk:Dvapara Yuga

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Hinduism (Rated Start-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hinduism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

When is it?[edit]

I'm unclear about when this age occurs; has it already happened? Is it going on now? Is it set to happen in the future? The article doesn't really seem to say. Pimlottc (talk) 20:52, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

See: ... Could somebody please explain the math whereby some people believe we are in Dvapara Yuga and not Kali Yuga? Dhanyavad. (talk) 20:37, 22 August 2008 (UTC) R.E.D.

Imagine the face of a clock. The year 499 AD would lie at 6:00, which is the bottom, or the end of the descending and the start of the ascending yugas. The year 12,499 would lie at 12:00, which signifies the top or end of the ascending cycle/ start of the new, descending yugas. (talk) 22:49, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

I don't understand on what basis the gentleman who wrote that actual age of dwapar yug was 2400 years.. can you provide details of the calculation? All the sources that I have read points to plus side of 800000 years.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chaturn (talkcontribs) 19:11, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Various spellings and lowercase[edit]

01-Dec-2008: I am adding a footnote to list alternate spellings, so that a wiki-search can find the article by those other name variations. A search-analysis of about 950 webpage links, in Google, revealed an almost 50-50% split between spellings with v/w (with "Dwapara" slightly more common than "Dvapara"), and with lowercase "yuga" in about 40% of webpages. Perhaps 10% of webpages hyphenated the term. Hundreds of webpages dropped end-word "a" (as "Dwapar Yuga" or "Dwapar Yug"). So there were the following numerous variations (in webpages indexed by Google):

Note that Satya Yuga was also termed "Krita Yuga" in 548 webpages (searched 01Dec2008). -Wikid77 (talk) 12:02, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

Redirection spellings[edit]

01-Dec-2008: Among the various spellings found in world webpages (from Google Search), the following names have been defined as redirection titles in Wikipedia:

Perhaps other spellings should be redirected, as well. However, for rare spellings, readers should just use a wiki-search to find articles containing that spelling, rather than define a redirection title for every possible variation. -Wikid77 (talk) 12:02, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

Interpretations of Swami Sri Yukteswar[edit]

Are you sure? That makes no sense! This is supposed to be a cycle of decline, so how can a cultural and intellectual renaissance possibly point to the arrival of an age of some lower order? —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 20:51, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

We are now in the ascending part of the cycle, as of around 499 AD. (talk) 22:23, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia is stooping to a new low, basing all their articles on Yugas on one sole recalcitrant, Yukteswar. Oh, so everyone else has had it wrong for countless millenia? This is the same kind of junk perpetrated by the Vatican-backed Müller dating of the Veda (they can't possibly be older than the Christian view of "history", can they?) and the myth of the so-called Aryan Invasion that never happened (there isn't even an "Aryan race")!

The best way to look at this whole thing is to get some perspective, as wheels-within-wheels. A complete cycle of the mini-yugas equates to the Precession of the Equinoxes (roughly), and 18 of such cycles amounts to 432,000, the building blocks of the Maha-Yugas. Sheesh. Samsbanned (talk) 06:49, 6 October 2014 (UTC)