Talk:E'Twaun Moore/GA1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: AdamBMorgan (talk) 13:21, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    There is a lack of consistency with piped wikilinks to teams (sometimes the college, sometimes the team name and once a nickname) but that may help the quality of the prose by making it more readable.
    B. MoS compliance:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    I cannot check some of the references (newspaper archives asking for username) but in general all sources appear to be good.
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail: