I've made a very slight run-on sentence in "Background and release". Passing it and "Composition", including the sample OGG. Passing images, both fair use and free. -- Zanimum (talk) 21:00, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
I noticed that, and thank you very much sir! XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 21:06, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for catching that! Giacobbetalk 21:10, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Background and production
Shortened French radio info, it was mostly irrelevant to readers. What Katy says is more important than where she said it.
The quote at the end of the section is over dotted, three dots per occurence only, please.
I recognize the logo, now that I Googled it. Interesting side note, Vogue Eyewear is owned by Luxottica, which owns Ray-Ban, Oakley, makes for Prada, Chanel, Armani... and then they own practically every eyewear chain: Bright Eyes, LensCrafters, Pearle Vision, Sears Optical, Sunglass Hut... good grief! -- Zanimum (talk) 00:53, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Does Sal Cinquemani have other criticism of the video? The quote you've included seems rather docile.
Looks good. While this format isn't chronological, it's most important first. -- Zanimum (talk) 00:53, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Passing "Track listings and formats", "Credits and personnel", "Charts", "Certifications", "Release history", "See also", "External links". -- Zanimum (talk) 19:57, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
Passing "Critical reception", "Commercial performance". References left, plus reviewing your changes. -- Zanimum (talk) 18:59, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
There is variance between references to Billboard. Sometimes it's "Billboard. Prometheus Global Media." and sometimes "Billboard (New York: Prometheus Global Media)." Are they even two different templates, perhaps? cite news and cite web?