Talk:EEStor

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject United States / Texas (Rated B-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
B-Class article B  This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Texas (marked as Low-importance).
 
WikiProject Energy (Rated B-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
B-Class article B  This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

(Newest comments to the bottom)

Facebook[edit]

Hello. Should the following be placed in the article?

May 5, 2011 on ZENN's Facebook page their spokeswoman Catherine Scrimgeour said, "the Company remains pleased with EEStor's progress. While I understand that it is frustrating that the progress EEStor is making has not been made public, they are indeed making progress and ZMC is confident they will be successful in commercializing their technology."

63.3.15.130 (talk) 03:27, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

No, because Facebook is a social networking site, not a reliable news source. If EESTOR had a real product, they'd have shown it by now. --Wtshymanski (talk) 03:41, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
Ian Clifford, CEO of ZMC has been making the same statement Catherine Scrimgeour posted on FB the last 5 years, EESTor is making progress, they will be successful in commercializing their technology. The fact is there in NO EESU from EESTor. If you come back in ten years and read this discussion page, CS, Ian Clifford, and the pumpers of EESTor will be making the same statement.--Shoshola (talk) 14:20, 22 May 2011 (UTC)

Potential Investors[edit]

Hello. When talking about Jim Miller in "Battery Breakthrough?" reference, the following information is not in the referenced material, "visited EEStor to evaluate the technology for potential investors." Unless someone can find a reference stating he evaluated the technology for potential investors, I'm going to delete this portion. Thank you. 63.3.15.130 (talk) 17:18, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

Sig. figs.[edit]

What's with all the digits in EESTOR press releases? A permittivity of "162,291"? Really? No error bars at all? *SIX* significant figures? Are we quoting their PR material accurately or have we interpolated something? --Wtshymanski (talk) 15:02, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia must delete this EEStor page if they want any credibility[edit]

By leaving EEStor's page up, Wikipedia is promoting Dick Weir's EESU scam!!! EEStor never had an EESU powering a CityZenn or meeting US 7466536 specs. There never was an EESU prototype that is the reason Dick Weir never sent an EESU to DOD, DOE, AFRL, SANDI or SIBR for testing! The peddlers of Dick Weir's EESU fraud in 2009 wanted you to believe Dick Weir's "disruptive" EESU was going to put all lithium ion battery companies out of business. Now in 2015 the same peddlers are spreading the story Dick Weir "disruptive" capacitor technology is going to take over capacitor industry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.146.149.111 (talk) 13:43, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

There is a deletion process for articles on Wikipedia, but it's unlikely you'd have the success with it that you desire. The best way to make a difference with this article is to add to the article information you desire with a neutral point of view (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view) and to make sure that it's properly sourced and referenced. If you were to miss either of these points it's likely that your edits would be reverted. All the best. Air.light (talk) 04:29, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on EEStor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:12, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on EEStor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:55, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed[edit]

Copyright-problem.svg Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.marketwired.com/press-release/eestor-corporation-announces-new-director-tsx-venture-esu-2097072.htm. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. /wiae /tlk 10:28, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

Numerical trivia[edit]

Do we really need an endless series of press releases saying that on thus-and-so date, somebody cast a spell that produced such and such a number? There's only one announcement EEStor needs to make that anyone cares about - just one trade show appearance with a suitcase full of capacitors connected to a rack of bulbs would be more convincing than all those "certifications". I think the PR needs to be thinned down. Are there any credible third parties writing about these guys any more, or is it all bloggers and press releases still? --Wtshymanski (talk) 04:23, 27 May 2017 (UTC)