This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Public Art, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of public art on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
A.J. Hackett did a bungy from the second level in 1987, not the top of the tower. Yes, he was arrested briefly by the French police, but was released shortly thereafter as the French police were satisfied that he was leaving the country almost immediately and would cause them no more trouble
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
Please insert the following subheading and text (which I have translated from the German-language Wikipedia page ) as a new subsection 1.1, thereby renumbering the subsequent subsections under the History heading:
Not done for now: The image size is too large to implement for now. Please reduce it to a thumbnail and double check your sources and content for any errors. When done, comment so, and I will re-evaluate. TrueCRaysball | #RaysUp 08:43, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
With the technical possibilities of industrialisation, there arose the idea of building tall structures. Tower blocks reflected the Zeitgeist of the period.
As early as 1833, the English engineer Richard Trevithick had suggested a cast iron column, 1,000 feet (304.8 metres) high, supported by 1,000 trusses and having a diameter of 30 metres at the base and 3.6 metres at the summit. However, Trevithick died shortly after publishing his plans. The American engineers Thomas Curtis Clarke (1848–1901) and David Reeves took up the idea and intended to construct such a column (Centennial Tower) for the Centennial Exhibition of 1876 in Philadelphia. The design was to incorporate at its core a cylindrical iron tube 90 ft (27.4 m) in diameter, anchored with stays of steel rope. The plan was not realised and, with hindsight, we now know that the construction would not have withstood the oscillations caused by wind.
In 1881, the French engineer Sébillot returned from a visit to America with the idea of lighting the entire city of Paris with a beacon atop a “sun tower”. When, in May 1884, the French government announced its intention to stage a world exhibition in 1889, Sébillot worked up his plans for the “sun tower” in collaboration with Jules Bourdais, who was responsible for building the Palais du Trocadéro. The richly decorated design, reminiscent of a romanticised reconstruction of the legendary Pharos of Alexandria, met with widespread reservations and was the subject of much public discussion until the official design competition was announced in May 1886. Due to their technical infeasibility, neither the Philadelphia Centennial Tower nor the Parisian “sun tower” was ever built.
Request to update and change current image of Eiffel Tower, s'il vous plaît
For this page, I am requesting approval of changing and updating the current image of the Eiffel Tower to a picture I took of it. My edits have been reverted because some users feel its unnecessary, but I feel the picture that I provided shows the tower better because of all the people in the photo; they give us a glimpse of all the tourists who visit it and local citizens too. It just all adds to the photo and the Wikipedia page.
Disagree : I think the current picture is perfectly fine. The current picture is a featured picture while the proposed picture is not. Blaue Max (talk) 22:16, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
Disagree :, also
Blaue Max What do you mean featured? Wikipedia uploaded this or did Wikipedia approved it? Aren't both photos great? I got opinions from several people and they said both are great. MonsieurNapoléon (talk) 19:06, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
Disagree , very strongly. The photo currently used is rightly a featured photo, the replacement not as good. For starters, the tower is irritatingly not quite vertical. And the sky is less punchy. It'sa OK photo but by no means great The photo in the article showing the queue for the tower is also a good photo & makes the (rather unnecessary) point that it is a major tourist attraction.TheLongTone (talk) 12:06, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
In this section it states "on 31 December 2000 the lights glittered blue for several nights to welcome the new millennium. The glittery lighting continued for 18 months until July 2001." The first date should be 1999 not 2000. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.8.131.52 (talk) 15:43, 4 August 2015 (UTC)