Talk:Elec-Trak

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Elec-Trak article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted on 29 March 2012 by reviewer AlexGraal (talk · contribs).

Agriculture Low‑importance

	Agriculture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Agriculture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of agriculture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AgricultureWikipedia:WikiProject AgricultureTemplate:WikiProject AgricultureAgriculture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Exceptionally unnecessary cite request, or is it just me?[edit]

Most of these attachments were connected by a 36VDC "power take off" using a NEMA 10-50 outlet, usually used in the U.S. for 240VAC clothes dryers and thus compatible with readily available cords in most of the USA since the sentence itself directly links the NEMA page that explains availability, ubiquity and purpose of the connector, and the page already links collector sites with comprehensive listings of the attachments and their connection types, how could this possibly need an additional cite? There is nothing to add that wouldn't harm the signal to noise ratio of the page as a whole.

More citations are always better. For online sources, if the websites ever go offline and were not archived, then the second source would be valuable. Although most information has just one citation, whenever there are extra citations, that helps reinforce that the information is likely to be accurate and serves as another resource of other information that could be used in the article. Adam MLIS (talk) 14:12, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Additional edits[edit]

Having done some general edits, I had some ideas for additional edits. Some of the items in the Further readings section would be better served as sources to cite information in the article. There also appears to be some bare URLs that will need attention. If anyone has a picture of a tractor, that would be super helpful and that can be added to the image section of the Infobox. Adam MLIS (talk) 13:26, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]