This article was created via the article wizard and reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Radio-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This article is part of WikiProject Electronics, an attempt to provide a standard approach to writing articles about electronics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Leave messages at the project talk page
Why you deleted my text about History? This is very importent science results. This article include in SCOPUS and she was citised Hansen and other scienties in works. This text was support by Diannaa and Quinton Feldberg. The History of ESA not stopped after Harrington and has now the 4th stage. Wiki-users should be know anout this. Swadim (talk) 18:47, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
I didn't support anything. My only interest in this page was to remove a copyright violation. — Diannaa🍁 (talk) 19:10, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
Dear Diannaa, But you didn't change my text about 4 stage of History and my reference. It was very true solution.Swadim (talk) 19:51, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
The text about the history without reference violates the my copyrights: "In 1960, Harrington. related the effects of antenna size, gain and minimum Q for the near and far field diffraction zones for linearly and circularly polarized waves, and also treated the case where the antenna efficiency is less than 100%" . This text is the full identical citation from pages 116 -117 of IEEE conference . Please stop this copiright problem and include my reference! Swadim (talk) 07:53, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
^R.F. Harrington, ‘Effect of Antenna Size on Gain, Bandwidth, and Efficiency,’ J. Res. Nat. Bur. Stand., Vol. 64-D, Jan/Feb 1960, pp. 1-12
^ abSlyusar V. I. 60 Years of Electrically Small Antennas Theory.//Рroceedings of the 6-th International Conference on Antenna Theory and Techniques, 17-21 September, 2007, Sevastopol, Ukraine. - Pp. 116 - 118. 
I'm sorry, but my opponent Caffemac didn't answer to my questions and remarks in talk page. The Concept Caffemac for this article is very limited. I'm so sorry that Wikipedia has he as moderator of this article. The Wikipedia is not a personal site and need consider all other points of visions.Swadim (talk) 17:57, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
Nanomechanical magnetoelectric antennas are ESA!
I strong propose to include in the article this text:
"Principal new type of electrically small antennas are nanomechanical magnetoelectric (ME) antennas.  ME antennas have sizes as small as one-thousandth of a wavelength. For example the length and width of the FeGaB/AlN active resonant body of this antenna for 60,7 MHz of electromagnetic waves are 200 and 50 µm, respectively"Swadim (talk) 19:57, 1 September 2017 (UTC).