Talk:Electronic Banking Internet Communication Standard
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
What about other European countries
[edit]The article mentioned that the E stands for European, but then only elaborated on Germany and France. What about all other European countries? ---- Bernburgerin (talk) 10:29, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
- They may adopt it. Of course the other European countries may develop others options but why should they do it? If the EBICS protocol is a good one and if it is already used in Core Europe then the other countries will probably align with it. Well, that's later, not now, just as the article says: it's somewhen in the future. - Just point out a thing: the thing was started in Germany, and France chose to take it over instead of creating its own successor the archaic banking protocols, so you may guess that they had evaluated the technology and that they found it to be good enough. So that's where the probability comes in that other European countries will come to the same results. (and it is probably limted to Europe as Northern America does often suffer from the "Not Invented Here" syndrome, but may be we are mistaken on that and the adoption process goes much quicker than expected). Guidod (talk) 19:31, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
Damir
[edit]For you card 109.163.169.93 (talk) 22:22, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
Categories:
- Stub-Class software articles
- Unknown-importance software articles
- Stub-Class software articles of Unknown-importance
- Stub-Class Computing articles
- Unknown-importance Computing articles
- All Computing articles
- All Software articles
- Stub-Class Finance & Investment articles
- Low-importance Finance & Investment articles
- WikiProject Finance & Investment articles