Talk:Ellen Jorgensen

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Molecular Biology: MCB

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Molecular and Cell Biology task force (assessed as Low-importance).

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women scientists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Peer Review[edit]

Lead Section -topic was concisely and accurately stated in one sentence -summary of all major points was provided -all info present is also present in the body - could add wiki links to other wikipedia pages ex. Genspace has a wiki page which should be linked Genspace

Article Organization-flow of information makes sense, article follows a logical order

Content -all information provided makes sense, related to topic -wiki links to relevant articles should be added as stated before

Balace-the article is balanced, no one side is favored

Tone-the tone of the article is Neutral

Citations-all statements are well cited

Sources- all sources seem reliable and references are filled out

This new article gives comprehensive coverage of the topic. The body of the article is divided into relevant logical sections.

Changes I would make to this article would definitely include adding wikilcnks as stated before. I would also add an early life section, if information is available. If pictures can be found they would add to the article as well. I would also recommend moving the lead section to before the table of contents, so that it is the first thing a reader sees.

Mrt122495 (talk) 18:38, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review[edit]

- Introduction has strong introductory sentence. Maybe give some context to what Biotech without borders and Genspace are. I also noticed that most biographies on wikipedia don't include sources in the introduction. - Article is well organized

- Education & Career: try to include where she was born and an early life section if you can find enough sources. Also include that she is currently president of Biotech without Borders (as well as Cooper Union adjunct). - Genspace: maybe rearrange the paragraphs a little. Put that Jorgenson stepped down at the end of the section as its own paragraph, and move the context about the company up. I like that you made a separate accolades section. - Publications: add some more context as to what type of publications they are. Maybe make sections for peer reviewed research/articles/ect. or include the journal they were published in or something similar so that the reader can figure out what type of publication it is without having to look at the full reference. Also, if she has so many publications you might want to mention that in an earlier section. Were most of them published at a certain school? or was it once she entered biotech? - Try to add more images - an image of her if you can find one, or else maybe the logo for biotech without borders as well

- Style is good, gets points across clearly and efficiently. Some of the sections feel like a list, so some smoother transitions would make it easier to read - Try to keep more consistency in referring to her as Jorgenson vs Ellen Jorgenson. I think once you switch to Jorgenson you can keep using that (except maybe at the beginning of a new section?) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anc12 (talk • contribs) 18:54, 30 March 2018 (UTC) Anc12 (talk) 17:04, 9 April 2018 (UTC)Anna[reply]