Talk:Erwin Arnada

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Erwin Arnada/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Gilderien (talk · contribs) 22:29, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

  • Thanks for offering to review. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 22:44, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Initial thoughts[edit]

  • Not a quick-fail Face-smile.svg
  • "Arnada applied to be a photographer for the daily newspaper Kompas." is not in the citation given.
  • Coulda sworn I had added it. Done. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:50, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
  • The way you have set up the references is somewhat bizarre. Why?

--Gilderien Chat|List of good deeds 15:24, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

Right ok. I have re-read it and I think it meets all the criteria. Although having images is not part of the GA criteria, I would recommend adding them if they are freely available, although my somewhat cursory search failed to turn up any.

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality: Yes. -
    B. MoS compliance:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources: Yes, with short style listing multiple online sources -
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales: Since there are no images, this does not apply.
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: doesn't seem to be possible so technically
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:

--Gilderien Chat|List of good deeds 12:17, 23 June 2013 (UTC)