This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music articles
A fact from Es wartet alles auf dich, BWV 187 appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 26 September 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
I'll check this over soon. JAGUAR 19:24, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
" Es wartet alles auf dich (Everything waits for You), BWV 187" - not sure why this is in bold when the other articles I've reviewed didn't have this in bold. No concern, of course; just nitpicking
Ideally the lead should be condensed into two paragraphs instead of one large middle paragraph and two short sentences
It's bold in all articles when I write them because it's a redirect, and known better by English-speaking people than the long German. We have a user who likes to change it to a link. For me, the bolding is more important, and the link can be found in the infobox and a footnote, for those who really don't know what BWV means. --GA
" The duration of the cantata has been stated as 25 minutes" - why has been stated? By whom? Perhaps it would sound better just as The duration of the cantata is 25 minutes or even The cantata is around 25 mintues long.
Someone worded it like that, and I keep copying, but like yours better. - "by Dürr", the ref.
"edited by Leo Treitler, with a critical report in 1967" - how about edited by Leo Treitler, followed by a critical report in 1967}
like it --GA
@Gerda Arendt: I couldn't find anything major enough to put this review on hold, so I'm going to pass it outright. It is well written, comprehensive and all of the sources check out. I noticed that you also improved some things carried over from the previous review too! JAGUAR 19:37, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! Did you see my growing Christmas greeting, with a link from the lead image on my talk? It's also for you! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:48, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
That's lovely! Thanks Gerda. JAGUAR 19:52, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
JAGUAR 19:37, 28 December 2017 (UTC)