Talk:Esker Fax

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing: Software

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Please do not use a robot to delete this page!

If you consider it advertising then please inform me why it is advertising, when as such as these is not:

4-Sight Fax AsterFax Courier Mail Server Fax2Send FACSys FAXCOM HylaFAX MessagePlus/Open RelayFax U-Fax

All the internal links from the Fax Server Solutions page: List_of_fax_software are in a similar vein.

It's written from a neutral standpoint and only covers a basic synopsis of what it does, much like many other of the fax server entries.

If you remove this entry without explanation I expect you to also remove all the other Fax Server entries listed above! Is it OK for me to mark all of those with the dbspam tag? Will that see them deleted?

Not a robot - just me using a newpages patrol program..... I note that this page has already been deleted twice.... What you need is assertion of notability. All the article says is that the software exists - find some news articles ( not blogs/forums/press releases for the company ) ... checkout the notability requirements at Wikipedia:Notability (software) which, although just a proposal has a pertinant sentence namely 'Software is notable if it has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the company itself.' . - Peripitus (Talk) 11:00, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I'll add some links of that type to the article. Do you have any comment about why the other Fax Server Software entries are allowed to exist without that criterion?Scrivs 11:06, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is full of poor articles... some get noticed and either improved or deleted and others don't. With over 1million articles it's not a case of being allowed to exist - just that noone has spent the time to do anything about it.... I'll pull the Speedy tag -> assuming good faith on your part that the software is indeed notable ... Peripitus (Talk) 11:55, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much for your help on this Scrivs 12:02, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This software is not notable, but the company is[edit]

I reviewed the links Scrivs added to the article. All of them are great references to establish notability of the company Esker, but not of this one program.

I suggest this article be moved to Esker (company) and rewritten entirely, using the links as references for the text. Otherwise it's in danger of deletion. Since Esker, the company, seems to deserve an article of some kind, that would be a shame. — Saxifrage ✎ 16:58, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It seems that there was a shooting at a building in the USA housing "software companies", including Esker and WTS Paradigm. The gunman was shot and killed by police, apparently. Sufficiently notable for an article?126.3.32.71 (talk) 05:26, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]