Talk:Ethel Voynich

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

POV?[edit]

This novel was very popular in the Soviet Union and was the top best seller and compulsory reading there, and was seen as ideologically useful;

-- is the last thing really important for the subject? In that case should we also add “The novel was not so popular in the United States because it was not considered ideologically useful?” ;-)

I mean, don't look for ideology where it doesn't belong. This is a brilliant novel that doesn't need any state controlled advertising to be loved. It is ridiculous to see DIY “soviet union experts” who have one answer ready for all possible questions. 213.131.7.83 (talk) 19:51, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion[edit]

Has anyone speculated whether the Italian revolutionary Errico Malatesta could be an influence on The Gadfly - Stepniak being a mutual acquaintance. Jackiespeel (talk) 15:55, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Marriage[edit]

According to Ancestry website took place in 1902. Jackiespeel (talk) 17:41, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Translator of Chopin's letters[edit]

We make no mention that her 1931 editing and translation of Frédéric Chopin's letters, collected by Henryk Opieński, is still the standard reference source for this material (it's listed as a source in our Chopin article). So, how did she become so fluent in Polish to be able to tackle this challenge? Her husband was Polish, as was Opieński, but we say nothing about any fluency she may have acquired through these associations, or through any other study. So, did they have a hand in the translating but she got all the credit? -- ♬ Jack of Oz[your turn] 20:24, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ethel Voynich. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:33, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]