Talk:Ethics of circumcision
This article is linking to intact.ca which is an insurance company...I think the intended link is supposed to be to intactamerica.org which is a circumcision advocacy.
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ethics of circumcision article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|||
| Article policies
|
||
Archives | ||
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Threads older than 21 days may be archived by MiszaBot I. |
| WikiProject Medicine / Reproductive medicine | (Rated C-class, Low-importance) | |||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| WikiProject Philosophy | (Rated Stub-class, Low-importance) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Contents
Journal of Medical Ethics, July 2013[edit]
The entire issue of the July 2013 Journal of Medical Ethics is devoted to the question of non-therapeutic circumcision of male children. This page won't be complete until the contents of this very important issue of the JME is discussed.
Sugarcube73 (talk) 17:15, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
- It would need a secondary source too Popish Plot (talk) 19:41, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Ethics of circumcision. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
- Attempted to fix sourcing for https://www.cpsbc.ca/cps/physician_resources/publications/resource_manual/malecircum
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
As of February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete the "External links modified" sections if they want, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{sourcecheck}} (last update: 15 July 2018).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:26, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Ethics of circumcision. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070616011136/http://bioethics.net/journal/pdf/3_2_LT_w01_Benetar.pdf to http://bioethics.net/journal/pdf/3_2_LT_w01_Benetar.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
As of February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete the "External links modified" sections if they want, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{sourcecheck}} (last update: 15 July 2018).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:07, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
"Medical body's views" and the "ethics of circumcision"[edit]
It is odd to give such weight to the view of medical bodies on the ethics of circumcision. What kind of ethical expertise are we to suppose medical bodies have? Srnec (talk) 01:44, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
- Usually both practitioners as well as biomedical researchers are required to at least take some coursework in ethics and basic research methodology. Additionally I would be surprised if all the research done on effects of circumcision were not put through an IRB. If you could, can you please clarify what you mean by "ethical expertise?" --Dabrams13 (talk) 03:31, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
- C-Class medicine articles
- Low-importance medicine articles
- C-Class reproductive medicine articles
- Low-importance reproductive medicine articles
- Reproductive medicine task force articles
- All WikiProject Medicine articles
- Stub-Class Philosophy articles
- Low-importance Philosophy articles
- Stub-Class ethics articles
- Low-importance ethics articles
- Ethics task force articles