Talk:Eurocopter EC145

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Military History Project?[edit]

Just wondering how the EC145 figures into Military History? (Born2flie 13:55, 1 October 2006 (UTC))[reply]

See below: The EC-145 is the basis for the US Army UH-72A Lakota, which was a Commercial-Off-The-Shelf (COTS) acquisition program. Jjvcfi 22:09, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, built solely for missions which any other commercial aircraft can be used for. I don't recall the Bell 206 being tagged by WP:MILHIST. Perhaps it is because the military variant of the Bell 206, the OH-58 has its own article, much like the UH-72 has. --Born2flie 02:50, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The following is a closed discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was there was no consensus. --Born2flie 03:25, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Recommendation[edit]

  • Support. Like the Hughes 300 redirects to its most current version, the Schweizer 300C, the MBB/Kawasaki BK117 should redirect to the company and model description that currently owns the production rights to the aircraft. Both articles are also stubs and will benefit from the merge.
    --Born2flie 00:31, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Support: Due especially to the minimal content of the BK117 page, as there won't be any new production of that model forthcoming. - BillCJ 01:21, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
      • Since the UH-72A Lakota is a EC 145, the merging action should perhaps include this article too or at least include the links Jaypee1 09:35, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
        This has been discussed and rejected several times on the UH-72A Lakota talk page. Links should already be included. - BillCJ 00:07, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose - There is enough info in the other article to keep on its own. And why should the non-continuation of a product have anything to do with whether an article will be extended? MadMaxDog 08:03, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose - Oppose merge of MBB/Kawasaki BK117 with EC 145 and oppose merge of EC 145 and UH 72 Chwyatt 19:23, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Cruise/ Maximum Speed[edit]

This doesn't make sense

Never exceed speed: 278 km/h (150 kts) Maximum speed: 278 km/h (150 kts) Cruise speed: 280 km/h (151 kts)

How can the cruise speed exceed the maximum speed? Doyley 22:24, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps because VNE is specified as IAS in the manual, while cruise speeds are specified as TAS? Ojw (talk) 18:29, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A rate of climb of more tahn 10 m/s seems pretty unrealistic - someone pls check the value of 14... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.156.47.238 (talk) 12:55, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

unit descrepancy[edit]

is there a particular reason why cubic meters are equated to square feet?

DocKrin (talk) 14:44, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Operators[edit]

The presence of EC145 like air ambulance in Tuscany is a fact, and the photo is a primary source because it is not a manipulated image. Add "citation needed" is better than revert a fact if not enought referenced. When information is unsourced, and it is doubtful any sources are available for the information, it can be boldly removed. If you think a source can be found, but you do not wish to supply one yourself, you can add the template [citation needed] ([citation needed] will also work) after the statement, which will add [citation needed]. This will encourage someone, often the editor who initially added the statement, to add a citation for the information. Assianir (talk) 18:03, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

We can not use Wikipedia as a source, as per WP:CIRCULAR - FOX 52 (talk) 19:18, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
In this case wikipedia it isn't used like a source. The source is a photograph and it is a primary source. I found this links too http://www.sicurezzaesoccorso.com/gallery/displayimage.php?pid=11607&fullsize=1 http://www.sicurezzaesoccorso.com/gallery/displayimage.php?pid=17331&fullsize=1 but for copyright reasons we cannot use them. Not always revert is the best option sometime think to use [citation needed]. Assianir (talk) 22:53, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The problem with an image by itself is that it leaves open to a whole lot of interpretations. Who operates the aircraft? You have Navy on the stabilizer fin, Pegaso 1 on the engine cowling, and Regione Toscana on the door. You have no way to verify the information. Metadata must at the very least accompany the picture.FOX 52 (talk) 23:25, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • (e/c) Agreed, an image by itself not enough of a source. The image can be left as a source with a {{vs}} or a similar tag. -Fnlayson (talk) 23:57, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • The University of Nevada, Reno Libraries define primary sources as providing "an inside view of a particular event". They offer as examples: original documents, such as autobiographies, diaries, e-mail, interviews, letters, minutes, news film footage, official records, photographs, raw research data, and speeches; creative works, such as art, drama, films, music, novels, poetry; and relics or artifacts, such as buildings, clothing, DNA, furniture, jewelry, pottery. Assianir (talk) 00:07, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Regione (Regions are autonomous entities or Administrative districts with powers - region-based healthcare system) Toscana means Tuscany. The emergency medical service in Italy are free of charge for everybody. The service is paid by regions with taxes. The air ambulance is a service performed by a international company - contractor: www.inaer.com; I-NAVY is just a code. In Tuscany are operating 3 AA EMS: Pegaso 1, Pegaso 2 and Pegaso 3 (AgustaWestland AW139 id code I-EITD) http://www.sicurezzaesoccorso.com/gallery/index.php?cat=291Assianir (talk) 23:48, 29 March 2013 (UTC).[reply]
No matter what the University of Nevada says, here on Wikipedia we have a list of reliable sources, that should be closely followed. Unfortunately this is not a reliable source as it is a self-published page WP:SPS - FOX 52 (talk) 01:47, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Have to agree with FOX 52 an image is not a reliable source particularly in this case as we still do not know who owns or operates I-NAVY (which is not a code but its aircraft registration. Google search doesnt come up with anything other than more images of I-NAVY and I-JUNO. Not sure with an aircraft like the EC145 that individual EMS type operators are actually that notable to the type, perhaps the government operators sections should be just those operated by the state. MilborneOne (talk) 15:36, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
maybe you should try this? [1] Assianir (talk) 17:49, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Also not sure that the related image File:Elisoccorso Toscana pegaso.jpeg is actually good enough for the article, it appears out of focus and cluttered and doesnt really show us anything about the helicopter that is not in the other images. MilborneOne (talk) 15:38, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I do not agree with your way of doing things (remove any line without source) and to argue but at this point I think it is useless to continue. Remove quietly what suits you, and I will avoid re-enter itAssianir (talk) 21:05, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:V, unsourced text can be removed at anytime, including right away. If you want the text to be retained then please cite a reliable source. - Ahunt (talk) 21:37, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If the Met Police in London use it shouldn't the UK be shaded blue on the map? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.185.208.103 (talk) 14:53, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

EC145 and BK117 are the same helicopter type...[edit]

... also they look not very alike. Please reconsider the merge of both wiki pages. see also: MBB/Kawasaki_BK_117 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.174.101.254 (talk) 21:02, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

EC145 and H145 have different engines[edit]

H145 has new engine deployed in August 2014 along with the H145, EC145 has the 1E2 installed.[1] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sdlkjj (talk • contribs) 09:26, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ https://www.safran-group.com/products-services/arriel-2e-airbus-h145-engine

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page[edit]

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

  • http://www.aerospace-technology.com/projects/eurocopter_ec145/
    Triggered by \baerospace-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 10:08, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Eurocopter EC145. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:19, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Eurocopter EC145/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

== Stub class == No Development or History and no Specifications. (Born2flie 13:54, 1 October 2006 (UTC))[reply]

Last edited at 13:54, 1 October 2006 (UTC). Substituted at 14:45, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 14 external links on Eurocopter EC145. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:19, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Eurocopter EC145. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:15, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Article name[edit]

I think this article should be renamed Airbus Helicopters H145. Since it is still in production, it should reflect the correct up to date name. ElshadK (talk) 18:45, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

We normally use the more common name and more than a thousand were built by Eurocopter, but if you think that it is better known in reliable sources as the H145 then please raise a move request to see if anybody agrees with you, thanks. MilborneOne (talk) 19:06, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It's been the H145 for five years now. Time to accept it. Dan100 (Talk) 23:10, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:07, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

3-view line drawings of aircraft[edit]

Does anyone have a high quality version of the line drawings for this aircraft there are some that may be replicated and traced at the CAANZ Website JamesNZguy (talk) 23:31, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Eurocopter_EC145&oldid=1201843489"