Talk:Evolutionary biology

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Evolutionary biology (Rated C-class, Top-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is part of WikiProject Evolutionary biology, an attempt at building a useful set of articles on evolutionary biology and its associated subfields such as population genetics, quantitative genetics, molecular evolution, phylogenetics, evolutionary developmental biology. It is distinct from the WikiProject Tree of Life in that it attempts to cover patterns, process and theory rather than systematics and taxonomy). If you would like to participate, there are some suggestions on this page (see also Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ for more information) or visit WikiProject Evolutionary biology
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Top  This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Biology (Rated C-class, Top-importance)
WikiProject icon Evolutionary biology is part of the WikiProject Biology, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to biology on Wikipedia.
Leave messages on the WikiProject talk page.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Top  This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

"Impenetrable" science?[edit]

Editors may have seen the recent Signpost which named Evolutionary biology articles as examples of "impenetrable science" here on Wikipedia. Certainly the first few lines of the current article are not specially inviting; words like "evolution" and "biology" are repeated without much explanation. Perhaps John Timmer had at least some sort of a point when he wrote that "Wikipedia fails as an encyclopedia, to science's detriment". Perhaps this is easily fixable here with a little friendly explanation, at least in the leads of a few key articles. Chiswick Chap (talk) 10:11, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

I've drafted a new lead and added some image captions with links and dates; I hope this is acceptable as a starting point. I'm sure much more can be done to improve comprehensibility here and in related articles. Chiswick Chap (talk) 12:48, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Geodakyan's evolutionary theory of sex[edit]

Help required with Geodakyan's evolutionary theory of sex: the article of apparently fringe theory is based almost exclusively on primary sources and edited by a people with strong connection to the subject. Staszek Lem (talk) 17:05, 13 October 2016 (UTC)