Talk:Ewald's sphere

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Physics (Rated C-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

Untitled[edit]

This stub and the stub on the Ewald construction seem to be about essentially the same thing. I propose that they should be mergedYadevol 13:46, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Ewald's sphere/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

This page (stub) contains inaccuracies and is hard to understand, even for a professional crystallographer. the most glaring mistake is that the radius of the sphere is 1/lambda NOT 2pi/lambda.

see IUCr for better discription

http://reference.iucr.org/dictionary/Ewald_sphere

Last edited at 11:09, 30 May 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 14:50, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Is the figure right?[edit]

The figure of Ewald construction is quite confusing, at least for me as a beginner. None of my text book is drawn like that. Schenad (talk) 11:10, 13 October 2016 (UTC)