Talk:Eyalet

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Sources for expansion of this and individual articles[edit]

  • Orhan Kılıç. XVII. Yüzyılın İlk Yarısında Osmanlı Devleti'nin Eyalet ve Sancak Teşkilatlanması, Osmanlı, Cilt 6: Teşkilât, Yeni Türkiye Yayınları. (Ankara) 1999. ISBN 975-6782-09-9. (in Turkish)

Thorough but in Turkish. (Not online?)

Includes commanders and sanjaks in the mid-17th century.

Includes mid-19th century area and population figures.

Many details, incl. major cities. — LlywelynII 06:27, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Clickable Map[edit]

Is cool, but would benefit from

(A) finding a projection that expanded Rumelia and Anatolia and shrank the huge single-province expanses in Africa

and

(B) inclusion of all provinces. Archipelago should appear, probably over its capital at Gallipoli. — LlywelynII 06:26, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merge[edit]

In the Ottoman Empire, an Eyalet was the same as a Pashalik, which is the same as a Beylerbeylik. Oncenawhile (talk) 21:33, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have already merged Pashalik and redirected it to this article, but Beylerbeylik cannot be merged, if it was also used by Safavid Persia as claimed in the article.--eh bien mon prince (talk) 15:18, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I have sorted this by creating Beylerbeylik (Safavid Persia), and disambiguating the original page. Oncenawhile (talk) 10:22, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
For what it's worth, I can't find any evidence that the Safavids divided their provinces using a turkic name. It is possible, given the Azeri Turkic heritage of the Safavids and the Turko-Persian tradition of the region. Either way, it has its own article now, so i will try to get some focus on it. Oncenawhile (talk) 10:32, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Eyalet. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:41, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:36, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]