Talk:F. Paul Wilson

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

"due entirely to the incontinent issue of fiat money by the Federal Reserve. ... enabling the reader to readily understand that the flaming fraudulence masquerading as "monetary policy" is simply another kind of thieving government confidence game." This needs to be re-written: it is clearly POV ("entirely," "confidence game").Kdammers 00:37, 28 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I've cleaned up the LaNague Chronicles listing. Hopefully, no one will mess it up. Emb021 14 March 2006

"Wilson is a noted fan of the horror great H. P. Lovecraft and has written more than a few Cthulhu Mythos stories and novels." Ok. could someone point out the Cthulhu Mythos stories and novels? I am not aware of any, other then a few short stories. Many of his horror stories (including the Repairman Jack stuff) is 'mythos-like', but not explicity linked. --Emb021 16:03, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Keep makes explicit mention of some of the "notorious grimoires" of the Mythos, including Unaussprechlichen Kulten and De Vermis Mysteriis. Cuza finds them in the keep and uses them to discern the identity and purpose of Molassar. Canonblack 12:28, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The link to the novel Bloodline goes to a book written by somebody else in the 1970's. Can somebody correct this?--Guerre 17:13, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think we should add "Doctor" to Paul's occupation (currently "Author"), as he is also a part-time physician, and this is an important part of his life. Bymightywaterways (talk) 03:33, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lead section now acceptable?[edit]

The single sentence of the lead section looks unexceptionable to me. Assuming it now meets 'Pedia standards, can somebody w/ the capability take the complaining note off this article?

And if it doesn't, will somebody explain why the heck it's NOT acceptable? GeorgeTSLC (talk) 17:35, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The template that calls its acceptability into question contains two links, which you obviously did not follow, to extensive information about what is required by WP in an article lead. This lead does not meet those requirements, therefore the template. If I had no idea who Wilson was, that lead would not give me any better idea. He's a writer from New Jersey? So what? Why does he warrant a WP article? Rewrite the lead to answer that question, and it will be closer to meeting the acceptability requirements. 12.233.147.42 (talk) 00:59, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on F. Paul Wilson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:19, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on F. Paul Wilson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:23, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:F._Paul_Wilson&oldid=1210124036"