|WikiProject United States|
|This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Assigned student editor(s): Pedrogaytan12.|
Keystone XL pipeline
It is mentioned in the "Political lobbying and ads" section and also in the "Viability of the approach" section. The Keystone XL Pipeline isn't mentioned by name, but the general thrust is there. You could add a reference to it; I didn't want to include too much specific detailed information since the particular controversy changes from day to day. Vipul (talk) 05:19, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
- I'm going to add this as its own subject under reception, as it was a major controversy that caused two big name -- Elon Musk and David Sacks -- to leave the group. Fortibus (talk) 18:18, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
It seems this section is an individual's political analysis of the group's actions. All information in this section is also covered under the "Criticisms" section, so it is a bit redundant. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.127.116.11 (talk) 20:01, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on FWD.us. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130416045611/http://www.fwd.us/our_supporters to http://fwd.us/our_supporters
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
You may set the
|checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting
|needhelp= to your help request.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
If you are unable to use these tools, you may set
|needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.
This article doesn't have any information from after 2014. Their website doesn't seem to have much of the stuff that made them controversial back in 2013 and 2014, so I assume they've moved closer to the views of other pro-immigration organizations. In particular, the article is missing information on their response to Trump's immigration policies. Qzekrom (talk) 01:00, 30 December 2017 (UTC)