From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Former good article Facebook was one of the Social sciences and society good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
This article has been mentioned by a media organization:

Would probably be a good idea to include pokes and reactions in the website section[edit]

Also, maybe a note on the controversy surrounding Facebook video hosting? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Doubletriplereversepsychology (talkcontribs) 17:12, 22 May 2016 (UTC) >"Free basics" controversy in India >Safety Check bug >U.S. federal tax examination >Support for terrorism lawsuit >Social impact/Emotional health impact/Political impact >United States/U.S. /USA... not a single word <FSB> or <KGB>. I see plainly bad. (Perhaps because of a drug poisoning?) Federally Intiligent Servise Russia is, indeed, no terrorist's or hacker's. Where to be ashamed? Face Boock User's are well covered by Moskwa. which is a positive momentHydrokortison Cortisol (talk) 15:01, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Rainbow/US flag filter controversy[edit]

There should be an article about the rainbow flag filter created in the aftermath of the (fantastic) news in America, the news speculation about it being a Facebook social experiment, and the backlash by conservatives who are using a US flag filter. Theres def. something notable in there.

Semi-protected edit request on 6 July 2016[edit]

I want to add a few important informative sentences at a proper place to the article. I want to add these lines: "Hundreds of free and paid apps and services are also used to get the most out of facebook such as Facebook Dating Guide, Facebook Advertising Guide, Facebook Like Page Builder and Jump Start Your FB Marketing etc." Mildgrim (talk) 05:00, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

If you could exactly specify where you want this placed, that would bring more clarity to this request and make it easier to act on. As of now, there's not much to do. Also, please be wary what Wikipedia is not, see WP:NOTADVERTISING. The wording of your proposal would need to be tweaked a bit to make it sound less promotional in tone. Keep in mind that edit requests do not open up access to editing semiprotected articles. I'm closing the request as Not done for now. Re-open by changing "answered=yes" to "answered=no" if you can specify exactly where you want this (with tweaks) added. — Andy W. (talk ·ctb) 06:38, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Spins Smocke of Faceboock Seit's[edit]

Make the one ciber-program or the manuel, handmade?Hydrokortison Cortisol (talk) 14:49, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Racy screenshot of the website?[edit]

I think the screenshot of a user profile looks a bit racy and inappropriate for the article. Could I replace it with a different picture? Simplyianm (talk) 19:28, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 17 October 2016[edit]

may i edit.?? (talk) 21:42, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

Symbol declined.svg Declined This page is protected so that anonymous users can't edit it. If you want someone to make a change for you, a specific request is required. agtx 21:44, 17 October 2016 (UTC)