Jump to content

Talk:Fast neutron therapy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

note

[edit]

What about the normal tissue complications that are more prevalent with Neutron therapies compared to photon therapies? This has been ignored.

What about them indeed. Complications are a clinical outcome. Although efficacy is stated, and claimed by various references, I include no data on outcomes.

This part of the article doesn't make sense: "The presence of oxygen in a cell acts as a radiosensitizer , making the effects of the radiation more damaging. Tumor cells typically have a lower oxygen content than normal tissue. This medical condition is known as tumor hypoxia and therefore the oxygen effect acts to increase the sensitivity of tumor tissue.[8]"

IF: tumor cells have LOWER oxygen content AND IF: the PRESENCE of oxygen in a cell acts as a radioSENSITIZER {so, in effect REDUCED oxygen supply would make the cell 'radioINSENSITIVE'} THEN: tumor cells would be LESS sensitive to radiation, not MORE sensitive {since they have REDUCED oxygen supply}

I even found it HERE: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tumor_hypoxia, specifically: "Tumor hypoxia is the situation where tumor cells have been deprived of oxygen. As a tumor grows, it rapidly outgrows its blood supply, leaving portions of the tumor with regions where the oxygen concentration is significantly lower than in healthy tissues. Hypoxic tumor cells are usually resistant to radiotherapy and chemotherapy[1]..." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.139.186.169 (talk) 03:07, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

X-ray energies

[edit]

In regards to the x-ray energy " 1 -25 MeV ", This might just be a typo, however this isn't correct. Perhaps one meant the total energy incident upon the biological material adds up to 1-25 MeV which is still quite high. Reason for this is the x-ray source target material will always have a characteristic emission wavelength on the range of 10 keV. The highest energy x-ray that can be produced is characteristic of Uranium with an energy of roughly 114.5 keV in the Kβ emission spectra. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.223.232.188 (talk) 17:32, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Neutrons fron reactors??

[edit]

The present introduction starts "Fast neutron therapy utilizes high energy neutrons typically between 50 and 70 MeV to treat cancer. Most fast neutron therapy beams are produced by reactors, (...)" No. The maximum neutron energy from a reactor is about 10 MeV, at very low neutron flux. On average, the fast neutrons in a reactor (before they are moderated) have about 2 MeV. --UvM (talk) 16:12, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 9 external links on Fast neutron therapy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:24, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Fast neutron therapy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:54, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Fast_neutron_therapy&oldid=1201932184"