Talk:Fatah Ka Fatwa

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

@Kailash29792: can you please check this page. Thanks. Sid95Q (talk) 16:46, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, not my kind or field of editing. Kailash29792 (talk) 17:39, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Cyphoidbomb: Can you check this page's language. Sid95Q (talk) 19:54, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Sid95Q: Like many articles it could use improvements to its language. I don't know that describing it as controversial in the lead is the best approach. A lot of shows deal in controversial subjects without being labeled. "The show was well received" could perhaps be a bit more specific as to whether we're talking about viewership numbers or critical response. If it is controversial "well received" could erroneously paint the picture that it is widely appreciated, when perhaps many people watch it to be outraged. Geraldo (talk show) was both controversial and many people watched it, but it wasn't exactly "well received". "A huge engagement on social media" reads as promotional puffery. We probably don't need a unique section on Complaints, as that does relate to reception. Independent sections that unduly focus on negative events can skew neutrality. This is why many editors discourage Controversy sections in articles. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 05:30, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Article does not match the sources cited[edit]

The article states (under reception) that Maulana Ansar Raza filed the PIL against the show. However, the source cited [1] states that the PIL was filed by UP resident Hifzur Rehman Khan. In fact, the source doesn't mention Maulana Ansar Raza at all.Mitsurugi78 (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 00:23, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

References