Talk:Federal Constitutional Court

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Grammar review[edit]

This page needs some serious grammar review :-( Hazzl 15:43, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)


Without sourcing, this cannot be higher than start class. Aboutmovies (talk) 08:25, 17 December 2008 (UTC)

Why not a critic-part?[edit]

In the page of the US Supreme Court it give a interesst and fair part for critics about the system. Why not here? —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 20:18, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

It's not that easy to compare the Bundesverfassungsgericht with the US Supreme Court and maybe there isn't that much to complain about. (talk) 18:33, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
Politicians will sometimes complain that it decides too much in details, but it is generally acknowledged that this is rather a failure of politics to get these details straight on their own, than "judicial activism" in the US sense of the word. However, I hold some of its decisions which pass a long the line of a "religious neutrality", not demanded by the Basic Law or, as I perceive, a law on federal level, and directly contradicting some Länder constitutions, on a wrong way. Most notably the Crucifix decision. -- (talk) 16:47, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
There are certainly decisions by this court that deserve criticism, I for instance think that the Incest-Decision or Osho&Glykol are wrong. And I also think that it's possible to find "valid" criticism of its decisions. However there isn't even a list or subsection of important decisions. And general criticism of the institution or its general behavior is very rare. So I'd agree with the User that answered before me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 20:52, 13 December 2011 (UTC)