This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
In the page of the US Supreme Court it give a interesst and fair part for critics about the system. Why not here? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 18.104.22.168 (talk) 20:18, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
It's not that easy to compare the Bundesverfassungsgericht with the US Supreme Court and maybe there isn't that much to complain about. 22.214.171.124 (talk) 18:33, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
Politicians will sometimes complain that it decides too much in details, but it is generally acknowledged that this is rather a failure of politics to get these details straight on their own, than "judicial activism" in the US sense of the word. However, I hold some of its decisions which pass a long the line of a "religious neutrality", not demanded by the Basic Law or, as I perceive, a law on federal level, and directly contradicting some Länder constitutions, on a wrong way. Most notably the Crucifix decision. --126.96.36.199 (talk) 16:47, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
There are certainly decisions by this court that deserve criticism, I for instance think that the Incest-Decision or Osho&Glykol are wrong. And I also think that it's possible to find "valid" criticism of its decisions. However there isn't even a list or subsection of important decisions. And general criticism of the institution or its general behavior is very rare. So I'd agree with the User that answered before me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.8.131.52 (talk) 20:52, 13 December 2011 (UTC)