|WikiProject Medicine / Reproductive medicine||(Rated B-class, Mid-importance)|
|WikiProject Women's health||(Rated B-class)|
How do I use it?
This article lacks any history, and seems to discuss none of the negative aspects.
How do I use it?
You guys (yes, you!) should add a section explaining how to use it. I don't have a clue of how to use that bag. Maybe no one has...—Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.8.131.52 (talk) 20:57, 20 November 2007
- Shouldn't it have all of the significant information about something? I think how to use it is very significant when it comes to condoms. The male condom version even has this little drawning showing how to use it. Why is female condom lacking it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.108.40.206 (talk) 21:41, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
I thought this was originally developed for gay male anal sex. Does anyone know for sure and have information on this topic? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.127.116.11 (talk) 02:12, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
Where do I get it?
Say I'd like to try out the latex version of the female condom. Is there any place at all in Europe to get it from? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 18.104.22.168 (talk) 17:26, 5 June 2008 (UTC) the blow job part of florence. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 22.214.171.124 (talk) 04:27, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
I have no idea what this FC1, FC2 is, or why it appears to be taken for granted in several sections. If this is a brand, the article should be revised to be brand-neutral.rubah (talk) 06:06, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
I feel like the massive cissexism of the name "female condom" should be addressed in the article. A) not everyone with a vagina is female; B) people use it anally; C) it promotes the idea that women must be receptive/bottoms/be penetrated in order to have sex.
I know many people who would much prefer that it be renamed the "receptive condom"