Talk:Fiesta de las Cruces

	Holidays portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Holidays, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of holidays on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HolidaysWikipedia:WikiProject HolidaysTemplate:WikiProject HolidaysHolidays articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Spain

	Spain portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpainWikipedia:WikiProject SpainTemplate:WikiProject SpainSpain articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Cut from article[edit]

I have cut the following. It was introduced into the Spanish Wikipedia by this edit from an IP address with only 3 other edits. It seems to me like the sort of thing that would require good citation. Also, it is not clear to me whether the 3 May Festival in Huimanguillo (which this site describes as the festival of their patron) even connects to the Fiesta de las Cruces.

In Huimanguillo, state of Tabasco, there is a legend of a cross that they wanted to move to the center of the state, but each time they tried to bring it there it returned to Huimanguillo. Every year on 3 May people come to visit who have experienced a miracle of healing. In entering the town they pass by a stream which remains dry throughout the year, but on 2 May 2 starts up and on 3 May overflows along the road, making passage difficult. They say that there is a specific part of the river where only men can enter and that women who have gone do not return.

- Jmabel | Talk 05:22, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

State of article[edit]

I'm translating this from the equivalent Spanish article, which I'm afraid lacks citations and doesn't look very carefully written. It looks like a lot of this material was added by anonymous editors on es-wiki. I've left out some things that seemed unlikely and in some cases I've removed redundancy, but this is pretty much what was there. I'd take this all with a grain of salt until it is better referenced. - Jmabel | Talk 17:33, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]