Talk:FindBugs

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
WikiProject Java (Rated Stub-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Java, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Java on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
Note icon
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-Class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
WikiProject Computing / Software (Rated Stub-class)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Software.
 
Note icon
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-Class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.

Sources[edit]

Would a blog entry on Java.net here count as a better source? I'm not sure. --Wrldwzrd89talk 12:40, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge with SpotBugs[edit]

SpotBugs doesn't appear to have any independent notability. signed, Rosguill talk 05:14, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support merge to FindBugs. No need for two separate articles. In fact, for people looking into this area, having two articles actually makes their research more difficult.Onel5969 TT me 11:11, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Boldy merged just now - there is really very little justification for having separate articles. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 18:06, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]