From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
WikiProject Highways / United Kingdom (Rated Start-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Highways, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of highways on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by United Kingdom Roads Task Force.


Could someone explain to me the point of this article? It seems like adding stuff for the sake of it to me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talkcontribs) 09:25, 7 June 2006

I creator of this article thinks it is needed as it is a heritage object of intrest to many people, including myself, in reponce to the reference needing sentence, that is a qoute from a article in the news from 2004. Lenny 08:36, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
I found this a useful and interesting article.

Please see:

<a href=""><img src="" width="160" height="160" style="margin:1px 0 0 4px;"></a>
<a href="" style="color:#4D4D4D;font-weight:bold;text-decoration:none;">Sussex Signposts</a>

— Preceding unsigned comment added by AshleyBones (talkcontribs) 22:05, 2 August 2007


I don't understand the sentence "Mandatory standards ... required ... lettering to be of a different typeface."

Different from what? Do the standard actually mandate that the typeface be *different* than something? Or does the standard actually mandate some particular typeface, which may be -- but is not necessarily -- different from the previous typeface? -- (talk) 03:45, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

It means it must be of a new standard typeface that was different from all previous typefaces ued. The result was the precurser to the Transport typeface. It was used on all roadsigns. UNI|SOUTH 10:43, 4 September 2008 (UTC)


Are you sure your using the term correctly; this doesn't seem to be a frontispiece (compare) at all? —Preceding unsigned comment added by BeckenhamBear (talkcontribs) 10:18, 31 July 2010 (UTC)


Just wondering if reference to the signpost in M*A*S*H would be relevant in this article? There is a public domain photo of it on the show's article.    → Michael J    00:16, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

I vaguely recall fingerpost signs in other war films used as establishing shots — army bases had lots of people far from home — and it stands to reason that the producers of M*A*S*H amped up an existing trope. I'll see if I can track down some actual Korean War and WWII photographs... kencf0618 (talk) 23:01, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Photo and variety[edit]

It would be cool to have a photo showing a fingerpost with actual fingers, like [1], though I haven't yet found such a pic with a suitable license.

These posts are also seen outside the British Isles; we have them in the U.S. though they are often decorative or whimsical. -- Beland (talk) 17:05, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

This one has a semi-restricted license which might work. -- Beland (talk) 17:12, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
But that's not a fingerpost -- it doesn't have any "arms". -- Dr Greg  talk  19:02, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
There is one in Commons here.    → Michael J    05:11, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fingerpost. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

As of February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete the "External links modified" sections if they want, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{sourcecheck}} (last update: 15 July 2018).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:36, 31 December 2016 (UTC)