Talk:First Unitarian Church of San Jose

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the First Unitarian Church of San Jose article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Christianity: Unitarian Universalism Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Unitarian Universalism work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

California: San Francisco Bay Area Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	San Francisco Bay Area portal This article is supported by San Francisco Bay Area task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted on 25 July 2010 by reviewer MSGJ (talk · contribs).

National Register of Historic Places Start‑class Low‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pre-creation comments[edit]

The Parish website is not a notable source. Local area websites are also non-notable and non-verifiable. Fridae'§Doom | Spare your time? 07:32, 19 July 2010 (UTC) Fridae'§Doom | Spare your time? 07:32, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Listing the same source thrice does not merit the article being accepted, it seems the other source was the one that was used primarily. Fridae'§Doom | Spare your time? 06:58, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I can tell, I've offered a citation for each significant fact from a reliable source -- the National Parks Service, the California Historical Landmark registry and the San Jose Mercury News, the local daily newspaper -- and have removed the non-notable sources criticized from the first draft. I only felt comfortable adding sections about the fire and the community center because they received significant press coverage in the newspaper. There are more citations and sources in this article than in the accepted article on First Unitarian Church of Oakland which is very similar. I need more clarification about what you believe is missing. Rcreative1 (talk) 16:10, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]