Talk:Fluorenol

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fluorenol. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:17, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Eugeroic?[edit]

It is my understanding, that it is the fluorenol analogue to modafinil, not fluorenol itself, that is a eugeroic. I am not enough of a chemist to figure out the structure of this analogue.

Mentropane (talk) 20:39, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

As surprising as it may be, the cited paper by Dunn et al. makes the claim that eugeroic activity of the fluorenol analog "was likely due to an active metabolite", which they identify as fluorenol itself. -- Ed (Edgar181) 21:19, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
That is surprising indeed. It would be easy to test this hypothesis, by administering fluorenol directly. In any case, this should be explained in the article. -- Mentropane (talk) 03:18, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I've modified the paragraph to more accurately reflect the results of the study. -- Ed (Edgar181) 14:22, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Great, much clearer! -- Mentropane (talk) 15:10, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]